2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings — A new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
228
0
18

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(265 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
12
228
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Many factors (or a combination of several factors) result in chip-off fractures, and the low bond strengths of veneering porcelains to zirconia is one of them 11,14) . Guess et al reported that the shear bond strength of porcelain to metal was 27.6 MPa, while that of porcelain to zirconia was 9.4-11.5 MPa 14) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many factors (or a combination of several factors) result in chip-off fractures, and the low bond strengths of veneering porcelains to zirconia is one of them 11,14) . Guess et al reported that the shear bond strength of porcelain to metal was 27.6 MPa, while that of porcelain to zirconia was 9.4-11.5 MPa 14) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the expanding use of zirconia frameworks is faced with a new challenge: chip-off fracture of veneering porcelains [11][12][13] . Factors that cause chip-off fracture are related to the thickness and toughness of veneering porcelain, restoration geometry such as lack of proper veneering porcelain support, inadequate framework design, location of contact areas, and bond strength of veneering porcelain to zirconia 11,14) . Notably on the bond strength factor, Guess et al reported that the bond strength of porcelain to zirconia was lower than that of porcelain to metal 14) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although clinical trials reported successful outcomes for zirconia-based prostheses, chipping of the layering porcelain has been identified as their most important potential limitation [5][6][7] . Approaches to avoid chipping have been introduced, including customization of zirconia frameworks to provide even and appropriate porcelain thickness 8) , sintering of a machine-milled lithium disilicate veneer onto the zirconia framework 9) , use of monolithic zirconia restorations that do not include veneer 10) , and layering of composite materials to the zirconia framework 11,12) . The use of monolithic zirconia restorations has expanded rapidly because of the reduced chipping risk of veneer, lower cost and production time, and diminished preparation depth 13) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several methods have been introduced, CAD/CAM facilitate rapid, low-cost, and precise fabrication of custom-made dental restorations for patients. In particular, CAD/CAM-based milling [1][2][3] produces dental restorations from block disks or pellets of ceramics, composite resins, or metallic materials. An all-ceramic system is currently a primary choice, although zirconiabased ceramic materials commonly used in restorative applications have poorer milling performance than metallic materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%