2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2004.03.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High statistic measurement of the K−→π0e−ν decay form-factors

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These parameters are customarily fitted to the kinematic distributions of the decay (or Dalitz plot) [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70], allowing for a calculation the phase-space integral (see next subsection). The Taylor-expansion parametrization introduces a number of parameters which can not be always determined experimentally free of ambiguities and more efficient parametrizations have been proposed [1,11,20,32], incorporating physical constraints to reduce the number of independent parameters.…”
Section: Kinematical Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These parameters are customarily fitted to the kinematic distributions of the decay (or Dalitz plot) [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70], allowing for a calculation the phase-space integral (see next subsection). The Taylor-expansion parametrization introduces a number of parameters which can not be always determined experimentally free of ambiguities and more efficient parametrizations have been proposed [1,11,20,32], incorporating physical constraints to reduce the number of independent parameters.…”
Section: Kinematical Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in section 3.3, this is the case of the WC se S,T , which are not constrained in a linear fit to the (semi)leptonic kaon decay data, and whose quadratic terms represent the leading NP contributions to the K e3 differential distributions. Indeed, this has been used by the ISTRA [64] and NA48 [65] Collaborations to set bounds on those WC. However, none of these fits contain simultaneously the four relevant quantities, namely, the leading SM form-factors parameters λ + , λ + and both WC se S,T , and the correlations are not given either.…”
Section: Quadratic Contributions Of the Wcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From recent experimental measurements of these coefficients [21,22,23], the current estimate for I is ∼ 0.154 (0.159) for K with an accuracy of around 1% [2,3], where a dominant error comes from the choice of the parametrization form of the q 2 dependence of f + (q 2 ). The choice of the reference scale q 0 = 0 forces us to study the q 2 dependence of the form factor and take the limit of q 2 = 0 as in Sec.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The present paper was written in response to that need. Further measurements of |V us | were performed by the IHEP [11], CERN NA48 [12], and KLOE [13] Collaborations, leading to a current world average [14] of |V us | = 0.2257 ± 0.0021. The KLOE Collaboration utilized radiative corrections documented in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%