2016
DOI: 10.1107/s1600577515022754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-speed X-ray imaging pixel array detector for synchrotron bunch isolation

Abstract: A wide-dynamic-range imaging X-ray detector designed for recording successive frames at rates up to 10 MHz is described. X-ray imaging with frame rates of up to 6.5 MHz have been experimentally verified. The pixel design allows for up to 8-12 frames to be stored internally at high speed before readout, which occurs at a 1 kHz frame rate. An additional mode of operation allows the integration capacitors to be re-addressed repeatedly before readout which can enhance the signal-to-noise ratio of cyclical processe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as shown herein, an understanding of these effects is important in 10 We defined an energy threshold per pixel at half the photon peak energy, E. Events above threshold were counted as one photon each, events above 3 times the threshold (1.5E) were counted as two photons, and so on. 11 Electron collection is commonly considered preferable over hole collection due to the larger µτ product for electrons. Figure 20: Distribution of the energy determined by the pixels of each Laue peak.…”
Section: Conclusion and Next Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as shown herein, an understanding of these effects is important in 10 We defined an energy threshold per pixel at half the photon peak energy, E. Events above threshold were counted as one photon each, events above 3 times the threshold (1.5E) were counted as two photons, and so on. 11 Electron collection is commonly considered preferable over hole collection due to the larger µτ product for electrons. Figure 20: Distribution of the energy determined by the pixels of each Laue peak.…”
Section: Conclusion and Next Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally the electronic detectors were devices such as television-type cameras or multiwire proportional counters (late 1970s to early 1990s), but the major advance was the introduction of image plates and charge-coupled devices (late 1980s to mid 1990s). More recently, these have been superseded by pixel array detectors (‘PAD’s, mid 2000s to present) using either photon counting [ 6 ] or charge integrating [ 7 ] technologies.…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous investigations using a Keck PAD system with silicon sensor [9] determined that the resolution of the time response was limited by the charge collection time of the silicon, some ten nanoseconds, and not the electronic response of the system.…”
Section: Polarization and Persistence After High Rate Illuminationmentioning
confidence: 99%