2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06666.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-speed photometry of the recurrent nova IM Normae

Abstract: The recurrent nova IM Nor is found to have an orbital period of 2.462 h, shown by periodic dips in brightness. This is only the second recurrent nova known to have such a short period. We interpret the light curve as largely produced by a reflection effect from the heated face of the secondary star, probably with the addition of a partial eclipse of the accretion disc.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The decay time t 3 10 d following the equation t 3 2.75 t 0.88 2 from Warner (1995) gives a rough white dwarf mass estimate of 1.16 M (mass ratio <0.2). Woudt & Warner (2003b) interpreted the deep eclipse as obscuration of the disc and did not detect any periodicity near the orbital period in the period analysis. Therefore, following the tidal instability model, it is again probable that the disc is not fully developed up to 3:1 resonance radius 3 years after the outburst; however, the authors argue that the disc radius is 47% of the orbital separation.…”
Section: Searching For Superhumps In Other Nova Remnantsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The decay time t 3 10 d following the equation t 3 2.75 t 0.88 2 from Warner (1995) gives a rough white dwarf mass estimate of 1.16 M (mass ratio <0.2). Woudt & Warner (2003b) interpreted the deep eclipse as obscuration of the disc and did not detect any periodicity near the orbital period in the period analysis. Therefore, following the tidal instability model, it is again probable that the disc is not fully developed up to 3:1 resonance radius 3 years after the outburst; however, the authors argue that the disc radius is 47% of the orbital separation.…”
Section: Searching For Superhumps In Other Nova Remnantsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A comparison to two novae within the period gap IM Nor and DD Cir with present irradiation effect (Woudt & Warner 2003b, c) can be made. The light curve of V5116 Sgr is different from those of IM Nor and DD Cir but similar to V2540 Oph.…”
Section: Short-term Variations Of V5116 Sgrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…have P orb > 100 days. The properties of IM Nor, which was not recognised as a recurrent nova when the review by Warner (1995) was published, are given by Kato et al (2002) and Woudt & Warner (2003). Schaefer (2010) recently proposed to divide the recurrent novae into two groups: i.e.…”
Section: Classification Of CI Aqlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was detected as a hard X-ray source 6 months after the 2002 outburst [12]. [24] found its P orb to be 2.46h which places IM Nor in the middle of the CV period gap, an interval in the distribution of CV orbital periods between 2 hr and 3 hr where very few CVs are found.…”
Section: Im Norma (Nova Nor 1920)mentioning
confidence: 98%