2008 42nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers 2008
DOI: 10.1109/acssc.2008.5074742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-speed parallel CRC circuits

Abstract: In this paper, we develop a matrix-based formulation for the Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC) computation that is derived from its polynomial-based definition. Then, using this formulation, we propose a parallel CRC computation structure with optimizations specific to the case when the degree of parallelism is greater than the degree of the generator polynomial. Afterward, through extensive simulations we obtain the optimum degrees of parallelism in terms of their critical path delays for some common generator po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(76 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that this presentation is similar to the generalized parallel LFSR2 derivation contained in [9].…”
Section: Parallel Lfsr1 Crc Formulationmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We note that this presentation is similar to the generalized parallel LFSR2 derivation contained in [9].…”
Section: Parallel Lfsr1 Crc Formulationmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Observing the formulation presented in the previous section, we note that there does not exist any feedback in (9). Therefore, one can freely retime the modular reduction of the intermediate by the generator polynomial to a desired number of XOR gate delays.…”
Section: Retimed Two-step Crc Computation Architecturementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, we provide a generalized recursive binary polynomial-based formulation for the non-retimed parallel LFSR2 CRC architecture, similar to the derivation contained in [20]. In Section III, this formulation will be further generalized.…”
Section: Name Polynomialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With all other tested benchmarks, CRC-32's accuracy never exceeds 70%. Considering the complexity of a parallel CRC-32 implementation [5,11] and its unremarkable detection performance, we believe it is not the ideal choice for our goals. Figure 5 plots the findings of this experiments.…”
Section: Detection Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%