“…However, it appears that the locus of plasticity expression can be reliably and easily estimated with CV analysis-using alternative methods such as analysis of NMDA:AMPA ratio, paired-pulse ratio, or quantal analysis in parallel with CV analysis generally give rise to the same interpretation (Reid and Clements, 1999;. Modern and more direct methods based on optical activation or readout are especially attractive alternatives (Jensen et al, 2017(Jensen et al, , 2019Durst et al, 2019;Ellis-Davies, 2019;MacDougall and Fine, 2019;Mitchell et al, 2019;Padamsey et al, 2019), since they in many cases are virtually free of assumptions. Still, all methods come with their own advantages and caveats, e.g., analysis of pairedpulse ratio may erroneously suggest presynaptic expression for NMDA-only silent synapses that undergo postsynaptic expression (Poncer and Malinow, 2001), glutamate uncaging can necessarily only explore postsynaptic expression, and dyes used with optical methods may distort plasticity mechanisms by buffering calcium (MacDougall and Fine, 2019).…”