2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2015.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-speed idea filtering with the bag of lemons

Abstract: High-speed idea filtering with the bag of lemons The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(44 reference statements)
1
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, raters can also use these ratings instead of relying on their judgment process as a way to decrease effort they apply in the rating process. As much as the number of likes can help raters make their choices, the crowd might have a limited ability to identify an idea's true quality (Klein & Garcia, 2015). Therefore, raters who have a higher tendency to follow the crowd might rely too much on the crowd's opinion and be misled, which can result in their making less accurate choices.…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, raters can also use these ratings instead of relying on their judgment process as a way to decrease effort they apply in the rating process. As much as the number of likes can help raters make their choices, the crowd might have a limited ability to identify an idea's true quality (Klein & Garcia, 2015). Therefore, raters who have a higher tendency to follow the crowd might rely too much on the crowd's opinion and be misled, which can result in their making less accurate choices.…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contest organizers use convergence platforms to distribute the large number of generated ideas among (crowd) raters so that they can independently evaluate ideas (Benbasat, 2010;Germonprez, Hess, Kacmar, & Lee, 2008;Zhang et al, 2002). Related work on platform design for idea convergence provides relevant insights into effective rating systems for idea evaluation (Blohm, Riedl, Füller, & Leimeister, 2016;Klein & Garcia, 2015). However, convergence requires a high cognitive load required from raters (Kolfschoten & Brazier, 2013) when reading, evaluating, and choosing ideas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted in the introduction, large-scale ideation systems typically do not live up to their promise in practice: they tend to collect large numbers of redundant and shallow ideas of variable quality [2,22,40]. The emerging literature on creative cognition and creativity support tools has identified a number of creativity-enhancing interventions that can significantly improve the performance of large-scale ideation systems by improving individual creativity and/or enhancing collaboration capabilities.…”
Section: Creativity Enhancing Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The promise of these online communities is that participants will benefit from exposure to ideas of others and, thus inspired, will generate better ideas than they would have otherwise. In practice, however, crowd innovation challenges result in large quantities of simple, mundane and repetitive ideas [2,22,40]. Consequently, many organizations have come to see crowd innovation platforms more as marketing gimmicks that energize their customers or constituents, rather than real sources of innovation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21] proposed a classification of filtering techniques over several cases. [21] pointed out the work with the management of ideas and creativity is not directly linked to large volumes of information, therefore the attention in the present research has been focused on collaborative filtering, since the participants are mainly human who select the ideas and classify them contributing to the development of their creativity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%