High speed, high capacity ATM optical switches for future telecommunication transport networks

Masetti, F.; Benoit, J.; Brillouet, F.; Gabriagues, J. M.; Jourdan, A.; Renaud, M.; Bottle, D.; Eilenberger, G.; Wünstel, K.; Schilling, Michael; Chiaroni, D.; Gavignet, Paulette; Jacob, Jean-Baptiste; Bendelli, G.; Cinato, P.; Gambini, P.; Puleo, M.; Martinson, T.; Vogel, Peter; Durhuus, T.; Jœrgensen, C.; Stubkjaer, K.E.; Baets, Roel; Daele, Peter Van; Bouley, J.C.; Lefevre, R.; Bachmann, M.; Hunziker, Walter; Melchior, H.; McGuire, A.; Ratovelomanana, F.; Vodjdani, N.

doi:10.1109/49.510922

Cited by 75 publications

(36 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Then the probability that a burst from an access station destined to another access station is blocked, Bp, is given as: (assuming that each WDM NE blocks the burst independently. ) (5) Analysis of a WDM Network. The maximum load that the network can carry is determined by the bandwith of the minimum cut of the network as C1'W.…”

Section: Analytical Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Just-In-Time Optical Burst Switching for Multiwavelength Networks

Wei¹,

Pastor²,

Ramamurthy³

et al. 2000

Broadband Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We describe the architecture, performance analysis and simulation result of a novel switching paradigm for optical WDM networks called Just-In-Time Optical Burst Switching (JIT-OBS) designed for ultra-low-latency transport of data-bursts across an optical WDM network. It combines the desirable features of circuit-switching and packet-switching, and features an out-of-band signaling scheme on a separate control channel with explicit feedback on delivery of data-bursts. We provide a performance analysis and simulation of the JIT-OBS approach, and compare its performance with those of circuit-switching and packet-switching approaches. We find that it has the best latency performance among the different switching mechanisms, and it has a better throughput performance than circuit-switching, and its performance is insensitive to network propagation delays.

show abstract

Section: Analytical Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The wavelength channels may be amplified and/or gain stabilized before they exit the switch. WDM switches [5] [6] differ in the extent to which they keep the optical signals transparent within the switch. In an all-optical WDM switch, the wavelength channels remain entirely in the optical domain.…”

Section: Wdm Switch Functional Architecturementioning

confidence: 99%

Just-In-Time Optical Burst Switching for Multiwavelength Networks

Wei¹,

Pastor²,

Ramamurthy³

et al. 2000

Broadband Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Some studies have shown that the ultimate capacity of photonics-based switches will exceed the capacity of large electronic switching nodes (Masetti et al, 1996;Zhang, T et al, 2006). Another advantage offered by photonics is the potential of optical transparency.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Optical Packet Switching (OPS) and transmission networks based on Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) have been increasingly deployed in the Internet infrastructure over the last decade in order to meet the huge increasing demand for bandwidth (Masetti et al, 1996;Danielsen et al, 1997;Chang and Mehta, 2010). An optical packet network consists of optical packet switches interconnected with fibers running WDM.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance Analysis of Different Optical Switching Architectures

AlQahtani¹

2011

Journal of Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Problem statement: Optical Packet Switching (OPS) and transmission networks based on Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) have been increasingly deployed in the Internet infrastructure over the last decade in order to meet the huge increasing demand for bandwidth. Several different technologies have been developed for optical packet switching such as space switches, broadcast-and-select, input buffered switches and output buffered switches. These architectures vary based on several parameters such as the way of optical buffering, the placement of optical buffers, the way of solving the external blocking inherited from switching technologies in general and the components used to implement WDM. Approach: This study surveys most of the exiting optical packet switching architectures. A simulation-based comparison of input buffered and output buffered architectures were presented. Results: The performance analysis of the selected two architectures derived using simulation program and compared at different scenarios. We found that the output buffered architectures give better performance than input buffered architectures. Conclusion: The simulation results shows that the-broadcast-and-select architecture is attractive in terms that it has lees number of components compared to other switches.

show abstract

“…Optical Packet Switching (OPS) and transmission networks based on Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) have been increasingly deployed in the Internet infrastructure over the last decade in order to meet the huge increasing demand for bandwidth [1][2]. An optical packet network consists of optical packet switches interconnected with fibers running WDM.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparison and Performance of Different Optical Switching Architectures

AlQahtani

2011

IJCNS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Optical Packet Switching (OPS) and transmission networks based on Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) have been increasingly deployed in the Internet infrastructure over the last decade in order to meet the huge increasing demand for bandwidth. Several different technologies have been developed for optical packet switching such as space switches, broadcast-and-select, input buffered switches and output buffered switches. These architectures vary based on several parameters such as the way of optical buffering, the placement of optical buffers, the way of solving the external blocking inherited from switching technologies in general and the components used to implement the WDM. This study surveys most of the exiting optical packet switching architectures. A simulation-based comparison of input buffered and output buffered architectures is presented. The performance analysis of the selected two architectures is derived using simulation program and compared at different scenarios. We found that the output buffered architectures give better performance than input buffered architectures. The simulation results show that the-broadcast-and-select architecture is attractive in terms that it has lees number of components compared to other switches.

show abstract

High speed, high capacity ATM optical switches for future telecommunication transport networks

Cited by 75 publications

References 18 publications

Just-In-Time Optical Burst Switching for Multiwavelength Networks

Just-In-Time Optical Burst Switching for Multiwavelength Networks

Performance Analysis of Different Optical Switching Architectures

A Comparison and Performance of Different Optical Switching Architectures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About