2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Speed Burr Debulking of Digital Calcinosis Cutis in Scleroderma Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, only 7 out of 19 patients, having only pharmaceutical treatment, showed any reponse [35]. Special methods, such as a curettage of calcinosis foci [66] or cytoreduction with a high-frequency microdrill [67], effectively reduced painful sensations and disability of calcinosis patients; however, lesions tended to recur.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, only 7 out of 19 patients, having only pharmaceutical treatment, showed any reponse [35]. Special methods, such as a curettage of calcinosis foci [66] or cytoreduction with a high-frequency microdrill [67], effectively reduced painful sensations and disability of calcinosis patients; however, lesions tended to recur.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calcinosis has been treated using a high-speed burr procedure in which small stab incisions are made through which calcium deposits are burred and extruded with saline. 8 Lapner and Goetz 8 suggest that the high-speed burr technique should be reserved for focal calcinosis limited to 1 or 2 fingers. Finally, carbon dioxide laser therapy has been used to vaporize calcium deposits with moderate resolution of pain, although results show limited success.…”
Section: Calcinosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debulking has also been performed using a high-speed bur through smaller stab incisions. 6 Outcome studies have been limited to case reports and small case series and have shown that many but not all patients have a good response to the procedure. 2,6 Some authors have advocated for radical excision of calcifications and flap reconstruction where necessary.…”
Section: Calcinosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Outcome studies have been limited to case reports and small case series and have shown that many but not all patients have a good response to the procedure. 2,6 Some authors have advocated for radical excision of calcifications and flap reconstruction where necessary. However, in our and others' experience, the risks of radical excision outweigh the benefits because it is unnecessary for symptomatic relief and the extensive soft tissue dissection entailed often results in severe tissue loss and scarring in these patients.…”
Section: Calcinosismentioning
confidence: 99%