2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2019.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High specificity of a rare terrestrial orchid toward a rare fungus within the North American tallgrass prairie

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
29
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the Portofino Park, higher read numbers for the dominant symbiont (T. helicospora) were found in soil samples collected underneath O. patens roots than in samples collected at sites lacking adult plants of the same orchid. Although not statistically supported, this observation parallels the results of Kaur and co-authors [31], who found that the six Platanthera praeclara-specific OM fungal OTUs were nearly absent in bulk soil at locations unoccupied by the orchids but exhibited higher relative abundances in soil at orchid-occupied locations. These findings are also consistent with assessments of spatial variation in fungal abundance in soil using quantitative PCR (qPCR), which have indicated that OM fungal abundance declines rapidly with distance from the adult host plants [16,64].…”
Section: Distribution Of Tulasnella Helicospora In Soilsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Within the Portofino Park, higher read numbers for the dominant symbiont (T. helicospora) were found in soil samples collected underneath O. patens roots than in samples collected at sites lacking adult plants of the same orchid. Although not statistically supported, this observation parallels the results of Kaur and co-authors [31], who found that the six Platanthera praeclara-specific OM fungal OTUs were nearly absent in bulk soil at locations unoccupied by the orchids but exhibited higher relative abundances in soil at orchid-occupied locations. These findings are also consistent with assessments of spatial variation in fungal abundance in soil using quantitative PCR (qPCR), which have indicated that OM fungal abundance declines rapidly with distance from the adult host plants [16,64].…”
Section: Distribution Of Tulasnella Helicospora In Soilsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Although putative OM fungi are rarely reported from soil in metabarcoding studies making use of generic fungal primers [57][58][59][60], when primers targeted to orchid-associated basidiomycetes [35] are used, these fungi are better represented [61]. OM fungi exhibit a highly patchy distribution in soil [15,16,31]. In our study, approximately 46% of fungi retrieved from Orchis patens roots (including T. helicospora) were also retrieved from soil samples collected in the Portofino Park (Liguria, Italy), including samples collected in areas where this orchid species has not been detected since 2014.…”
Section: Distribution Of Tulasnella Helicospora In Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They can also be used with DNA sequencing to identify fungi without destructive sampling of adult plants. DNA-based methods also can be used to detect mycorrhizal fungi in soils directly, but results can be challenging to interpret (Bougoure et al 2008, Egidi et al 2018, Kaur et al 2019. All of these methods have found orchid fungi to be more widespread than associated orchids.…”
Section: Seed Baiting To Locate Compatible Fungi and Suitable Habitatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High throughput sequencing (HTS) studies of fungal communities in plant roots are generally targeting mycorrhizal fungi (Buee et al ., 2009; Tedersoo et al ., 2010; Bahram et al ., 2011; Blaalid et al ., 2014; Vasar et al ., 2017; Kaur et al ., 2019), and the workflow requires the annotation of tens of thousands of OTUs/clusters of fungi into ecological guilds. Most studies tend to favour more conservative taxonomic ecological generalisations based at the genus level, which is traditionally considered the most relevant level for separating fungal taxa by nutritional mode (Fries and Mueller, 1984; Molina and Trappe, 1994; den Bakker et al ., 2004; Tedersoo and Smith, 2013; Garnica et al ., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%