2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High serum magnesium levels are associated with favorable prognoses in diabetic hemodialysis patients, retrospective observational study

Abstract: Background Recent studies have found hypomagnesemia is linked to a heightened risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients; however, the level of serum magnesium (s-Mg) necessary for promoting overall health in these patients and the effects of s-Mg in diabetes HD patients remains to be clarified. Methods HD outpatients (n = 148 under, age � 70 y) were followed over a 6-y period. They were divided into four groups according to their average s-Mg during the first year (L; low level,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We then carefully read the full text of each of the remaining 37 studies. Finally, 13 studies involving 205,436 patients met the inclusion criteria [11,13,14,18–45] . As shown in Table 1, the studies that met the inclusion criteria were all conducted between 2007 and 2020, involving 205,436 patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We then carefully read the full text of each of the remaining 37 studies. Finally, 13 studies involving 205,436 patients met the inclusion criteria [11,13,14,18–45] . As shown in Table 1, the studies that met the inclusion criteria were all conducted between 2007 and 2020, involving 205,436 patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ishimura et al [18] ★★★★ ★ ★★★ 7 Markaki et al [19] ★★★ ★ ★★★ 6 Ortega et al [20] ★★★ ★ ★★★ 6 Broek et al [21] ★★★★ ★ ★★★ 7 Laecke et al [22] ★★★★ ★ ★★★ 7 Lacson et al [11] ★★★★ ★ ★★★ 7 Fein et al [23] ★★★★ ★ ★★★ 6 Sakaguchi et al [14] ★★★★ ★ ★★ 6 Li et al [24] ★★★★ ★ ★★★ 7 de Roij van Zuijdewijn et al [25] ★★★ ★ ★★★ 7 Matias et al [26] ★★★★ ★ ★★★ 7 Garagarza et al [27] ★★★ ★ ★★★ 6 Kurita et al [28] ★★★ ★ ★★★ 6 Yang et al [13] ★★★ ★ ★★★ 7 Cai et al [29] ★★★ ★ ★★★ 7 Ago et al [30] ★★★★ ★ ★★ 7 Hughes et al [31] ★★★★ ★ ★★★ 7 Lv et al [34] ★★★ ★ ★★★ 6 Ferrè et al [32] ★★★ ★ ★★★ 7 Schmaderer et al [35] ★★★ ★ ★★★ 7 Sato et al [36] ★★★★ ★ ★★★ 6 Selim et al [33] ★★★★ ★ ★★★ 7 de Francisco et al [37] ★★★ ★ ★★★ 7 Zhang et al [38] ★★★ ★ ★★★ 7 Ye et al [39] ★★★ ★ ★★★ 7 Li et al [40] ★★★★ ★ ★★ 6 Lu et al [41] ★★★ ★ ★★★ 6 Mizuiri et al [42] ★★★ ★ ★★★ 6 Wu et al [43] ★★★★ ★ ★★★ 7 Ogawa et al [44] ★★★ ★ ★★★ 7 Guan et al [45] ★★★ ★ ★★★ 7…”
Section: Study Queue Selection Comparability Results Measurement Leve...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation