2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.08.27.505512
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High sensitivity single cell RNA sequencing with split pool barcoding

Abstract: Single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has become a core tool for researchers to understand biology. As scRNA-seq has become more ubiquitous, many applications demand higher scalability and sensitivity. Split-pool combinatorial barcoding makes it possible to scale projects to hundreds of samples and millions of cells, overcoming limitations of previous droplet based technologies. However, there is still a need for increased sensitivity for both droplet and combinatorial barcoding based scRNA-seq technologies. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the binned phase scores, clustering the cells into three phases, G1, S, and G2M, shows a more biologically representative clustering than the Leiden clustering (Figure 3E). The proportion of each cell type was similar to a previously published single-cell transcriptome analysis of HEK293 cells (16) when only genes with HybriSeq probes were considered (Supplementary Figure SA-B). Additionally, the expression distribution profiles of cell binned by phase score show a clearer trend compared to the subtle trend seen with Leiden clustering (Supplementary Figure S8, S9) and the pattern of co-expression in the scaled expression profile is much clearer when grouped by G1, S, G2M clusters (Figure 3F).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Based on the binned phase scores, clustering the cells into three phases, G1, S, and G2M, shows a more biologically representative clustering than the Leiden clustering (Figure 3E). The proportion of each cell type was similar to a previously published single-cell transcriptome analysis of HEK293 cells (16) when only genes with HybriSeq probes were considered (Supplementary Figure SA-B). Additionally, the expression distribution profiles of cell binned by phase score show a clearer trend compared to the subtle trend seen with Leiden clustering (Supplementary Figure S8, S9) and the pattern of co-expression in the scaled expression profile is much clearer when grouped by G1, S, G2M clusters (Figure 3F).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…To extend CD4 + T cell profiling to various autoimmune and infectious diseases, we performed a meta-analysis using publicly available single-cell data. 6 , 8 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 We integrated publicly available datasets with two strategies: (1) quantitative evaluation of cell frequencies by mapping to our reference and (2) evaluation of qualitative changes per cell type using NMFproj. We extracted CD4 + T cells from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) using Azimuth 62 and then mapped them to our reference using Symphony 14 ( Figure 3 A, the pipeline is available at https://github.com/yyoshiaki/screfmapping ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Evercode kit is compatible with fixed samples, enabling us to perturb, stimulate, and fix cells with our five distinct pathway perturbation libraries at different times, and subsequently perform scRNA-seq simultaneously on all samples. This workflow also leverages three levels of combinatorial indexing to increase the scalability and cost-effectiveness of large-scale analysis 42 . Briefly, our modifications included the addition of a guide-specific primer to the cDNA amplification reaction, and the modification of the PCR reaction conditions to optimize guide recovery without adversely affecting the whole transcriptome amplification (Supplementary Figure 1,2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%