2015
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00391-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I at presentation in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a cohort study

Abstract: SummaryBackgroundSuspected acute coronary syndrome is the commonest reason for emergency admission to hospital and is a large burden on health-care resources. Strategies to identify low-risk patients suitable for immediate discharge would have major benefits.MethodsWe did a prospective cohort study of 6304 consecutively enrolled patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome presenting to four secondary and tertiary care hospitals in Scotland. We measured plasma troponin concentrations at presentation using a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
340
2
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 451 publications
(371 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
17
340
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatives to this strategy have been proposed taking advantage of the fact that in patients with very low pre-test probability of AMI and Acute Coronary Syndrom (ACS), very low baseline cTn levels make the possibility of AMI highly unlikely [8,11,31,37]. If incorporated in the diagnostic pathway, such an early rule-out protocol could help avoid unnecessary tests and admissions for patients who do not have AMI but present with chest pain and have had cTn measured at presentation.…”
Section: Diagnostic Testing and Accuracy Of Troponin Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Alternatives to this strategy have been proposed taking advantage of the fact that in patients with very low pre-test probability of AMI and Acute Coronary Syndrom (ACS), very low baseline cTn levels make the possibility of AMI highly unlikely [8,11,31,37]. If incorporated in the diagnostic pathway, such an early rule-out protocol could help avoid unnecessary tests and admissions for patients who do not have AMI but present with chest pain and have had cTn measured at presentation.…”
Section: Diagnostic Testing and Accuracy Of Troponin Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, many EDs are resource limited and whereas purchase of equipment or extra staffing may not be an option [5], time and resource saving interventions that utilise existing staff may clearly be beneficial. With regards to high-sensitivity troponin, these topics have also been explored in clinical trials [31]. Whilst allowing for some assessment of impact, such investigations tend to be either expensive or time consuming, and do not allow the researcher to find the optimal combination of process changes in terms of resource and time benefits.…”
Section: Pathway Redesign In Emergency Departmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sex‐based differences in the clinical presentation, pathophysiological mechanisms, and outcomes of chest pain patients are increasingly being recognized. Compared with men, women with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) present more frequently with atypical chest pain complaints and a nondiagnostic ECG and less frequently with elevations of troponins 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. Also, women are ≈10 years older and tend to have a higher risk factor burden than men when they experience their first cardiac event 3, 7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A "common sense" algorithm, including the many protocols that have been proposed so far, can hence be developed and hopefully validated in clinical studies (Figure 2). Briefly, a HS cardiac troponin value at presentation lower than the limit of detection (LOD) of the assay in a patient with low clinical probability of MI would enable safe rule out of ACS, with risk of missing an acute ischemic event or experimenting MACEs lower than 0.1-0.3% (36). Conversely, a cardiac troponin value lower <LOD in a patient with medium/high clinical probability of MI, as well as a value comprised between the LOD and 1,000 ng/mL (whatever the clinical probability) both necessitate additional testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%