2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2010.12.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-sensitive electrochemical detection of point mutation based on polymerization-induced enzymatic amplification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[4] Such platforms must also support multiplexed detection and accurately differentiate between homozygous and heterozygous mismatches -a critical factor for many diagnoses. [5,6] Electrochemical DNA sensors offer robustness, portability, and compatibility with microfluidics and microelectronics, [7,8] and many varieties of electrochemical DNA sensors (as reviewed by Palecek and Bartosik) [9] have been developed for SNP detection, including various enzymatic [10][11][12] and hybridization-based assays. [13][14][15] Surface-immobilized, redoxreporter labeled probes offer many advantages in this arena as they require no exogenous reagents, exhibit low background, and can operate directly in complex mixtures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] Such platforms must also support multiplexed detection and accurately differentiate between homozygous and heterozygous mismatches -a critical factor for many diagnoses. [5,6] Electrochemical DNA sensors offer robustness, portability, and compatibility with microfluidics and microelectronics, [7,8] and many varieties of electrochemical DNA sensors (as reviewed by Palecek and Bartosik) [9] have been developed for SNP detection, including various enzymatic [10][11][12] and hybridization-based assays. [13][14][15] Surface-immobilized, redoxreporter labeled probes offer many advantages in this arena as they require no exogenous reagents, exhibit low background, and can operate directly in complex mixtures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LOD for the detection of SNPs by this assay was found to be in the order of 10 –16 M, which is a very impressive value reported for the detection of SNPs. Up to now, a number of amplication-free detection approaches have been developed for the detection of SNPs for β-thalassemia by various biorecognition strategies, including the oligonucleotides hybridization reaction, , the primer extension reaction, the enzymatic cleavage reaction, and the ligation reaction . Compared to these methods, our biosensor approach is simple and has better SNP discrimination than the oligonucleotides hybridization approach, exhibits superior sensitivity at fM levels, and offers a wide linear dynamic range of 7 orders of magnitude in concentration for SNP detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since physiological factors and mutated genes aflC or aflR affect aflatoxin biosynthesis in A. flavus, [31] the aflD gene will not detect gene expression even though this system can be developed by using quantum-dot (QD) electrochemical, [32] restriction endonuclease-based electrochemical biosensor technology, [33] and a polymerization-induced enzymatic amplification-based electrochemical biosensor [34] for the screening of point mutation in the gene. Therefore, this technique is more useful for enumeration of A. flavus rather than the toxicity detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%