2023
DOI: 10.1089/trgh.2021.0091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Self-Reported Satisfaction After Top Surgery in Gender-Affirming Surgery: A Single-Center Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study by Kuiper et al 24 found that in a small cohort of 10 patients, 6 decided to return to their original sex with 4 patients describing dissatisfaction in their transition due to the aesthetically disappointing surgical results. Another study by Day et al 26 found that among 84 MCS patients, 89.3% reported overall satisfaction when clothed, but dropped to 44.1% when unclothed, mainly because of dissatisfaction with postoperative scarring and nipple reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A study by Kuiper et al 24 found that in a small cohort of 10 patients, 6 decided to return to their original sex with 4 patients describing dissatisfaction in their transition due to the aesthetically disappointing surgical results. Another study by Day et al 26 found that among 84 MCS patients, 89.3% reported overall satisfaction when clothed, but dropped to 44.1% when unclothed, mainly because of dissatisfaction with postoperative scarring and nipple reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of regret in our combined cohort was 1.94%, well below definitions provided for clinical significance. Our results are 27 48 Park et al (2022) 28 3 Jedrzejewski et al (2023) 32 332 Cohen-Kettenis et al (1997) 33 5 van de Grift et al (2018) 36 33 22 18 Judge et al (2014) 23 15 Kuiper et al (1998) 24 8 Weyers et al (2009) 27 50 Park et al (2022) 28 6 Krege et al (2001) 29 31 Cohen-Kettenis et al (1997) 33 15 Olson-Kennedy et al (2018) 17 Judge et al (2014) 23 Kuiper et al (1998) 24 Tang et al (2022) 25 Day et al (2023) 26 Park et al (2022) 28 McNichols et al (2020) 11 Jedrzejewski et al (2023) 32 Cohen-Kettenis et al (1997) 33 van de Grift et al (2018) 36 Nelson et al (2009) 10 Total Phalloplasty Lobato et al ( 2006) 22 Judge et al (2014) 23 Park et al (2022) 28 Garcia et al (2014) 30 McNichols et al (2020) 11 Cohen-Kettenis et al (1997) 33 Boskey et al (2022) 34 van de Grift et al (2018) 36 Total Oophorectomy Kuiper et al (1998) 24 Baffo et al (2022) 31 Total Hysterectomy Mendiola et al (2020) 16 Olson-Kennedy et al (2018) 17 Kuiper et al (1998) 24 Baffo et al (2022) 31 McNichols et al (2020) 11 Jedrzejewski 36 comparable with ...…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations