Abstract:Using data from the Education Longitudinal Study of 2002, this study examines the association between high school socioeconomic segregation and student attainment outcomes and the mechanisms that mediate those relationships. The results show that socioeconomic segregation has a strong association with high school graduation and college enrollment. Controlling for an array of student and school factors, students who attend high socioeconomic composition (SEC) schools are 68% more likely to enroll at a 4-year co… Show more
“…There is quite a rich body of literature of international research on different mechanisms of school segregation and their relative importance (see, e.g., Palardy, 2013;Sahlgren, 2013). However, results tend to be inconsistent across studies, and so far little consensus has been achieved.…”
Section: Selection Of Students To Different Schoolsmentioning
“…There is quite a rich body of literature of international research on different mechanisms of school segregation and their relative importance (see, e.g., Palardy, 2013;Sahlgren, 2013). However, results tend to be inconsistent across studies, and so far little consensus has been achieved.…”
Section: Selection Of Students To Different Schoolsmentioning
“…International studies illustrate that unequal distribution of resources and the stratification of students between schools by their parental income or immigrant status, all other things being equal, are linked to lower overall attainment (Goldsmith 2011, Condron 2011, Vasque and Home 2013, and to a larger achievement gap between advantaged and disadvantaged students (Knowles and Evans 2012). The segregation of students is strongly linked to lowered patterns of high school graduation and college enrolment in the US, even after controlling for individual and other school factors (Palardy 2013). The mix of peers in school is linked to these longer-term outcomes but also to wider non-cognitive outcomes such as students' sense of justice , and to civic knowledge (Collado 2014), and subsequent civic engagement (Hoskins et al 2014).…”
The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details.
AbstractThe extent of between-school segregation, or clustering of disadvantaged students within schools, in England varies depending upon the indicator of interest. For example, the level of and trend over time for segregation by student poverty differs from those for ethnicity or special educational need. Additionally the causes of the level of segregation for any indicator will be different from the causes of changes in that level over time. This new paper uses data for all state-funded schools in England from 1989 to 2014 to identify the possible determinants of segregation. The results are summarised for England and its economic regions, and presented in more detail for local authority areas. The long-term underlying level of segregation of each indicator appears to be the outcome of structural and local geographic factors. However, the annual changes in segregation for most indicators can be explained most simply by changes in the prevalence of each indicator. For example, the UK policy of inclusion has considerably increased the number of students with statements of special needs in mainstream schools, and this has resulted, intentionally, in less segregation in terms of this indicator. Segregation by poverty varies at least partly with the economic cycle. Some of the explanatory factors, such as the global economy or the prevalence of specific ethnic minority groups, are not directly under policy-makers' control. This means that it is the more malleable factors leading to the underlying levels of poverty segregation that should be addressed by any state wanting a fair and mixed national school system. In England, these controllable factors include the use of proximity to decide contested places at schools, and school diversity as represented by the growth of Academies and Free Schools, and the continued existence of faith-based and selective schools.
“…International studies illustrate that the stratification of students between schools by their parental income or immigrant status, all other things being equal, is linked to lower overall attainment and to a larger achievement gap between advantaged and disadvantaged students (Goldsmith 2011, Condron 2013, Vasque and Home 2013. The social and racial segregation of students is strongly linked to lowered patterns of language development (Belfi et al 2014), high school and graduation and college enrolment in the US, even after controlling for individual and other school factors (Palardy 2013). The mix of peers in school is linked to these longer-term outcomes but also to wider non-cognitive outcomes such as students' social skills (Gottfried 2014), emotional and behavioural problems (Muller and Hofmann 2014), sense of justice (Gorard and See 2013), and civic knowledge and engagement (Collado et al 2014).…”
Section: The Importance Of School Intakesmentioning
The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.