2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Revision Rate for Large-head Metal-on-metal THA at a Mean of 7.1 Years: A Registry Study

Abstract: Level III, therapeutic study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The poorer performance of the ASR device may explain the difference in WB ion level development compared with the ReCap Magnum THR (Seppänen et al. 2018). Our data did not include any ReCap HR devices.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The poorer performance of the ASR device may explain the difference in WB ion level development compared with the ReCap Magnum THR (Seppänen et al. 2018). Our data did not include any ReCap HR devices.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined with the current findings, the results confirmed by these studies appear to verify that the DAA is the preferred surgical approach for converting a failed MoM-HRA. Metal ions can decrease the number of osteoblast cells by inhibiting their gene expression, theoretically increasing the risk of MoM-HRA failure and creating unnecessary obstacles for a future conversion [26,27]. The present results for failed MoM-HRA conversion to CoC-THA have also shown low rates of re-revision or aseptic loosening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…A series of disadvantages attributed to MoM cups have been frequently mentioned in previous studies. 2 , 6 , 8 , 14 These disadvantages have undeniably become key factors limiting the effect of revision. 7 , 15 Metal ions released by MoM cups affect the activity of osteoblasts at the gene level, which can make CTHA challenging to perform.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no effective coping strategies have been developed with the exception of prosthetic revision. 6 , 7 The occurrence of severe complications after MoM-THA associated with adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) are common and may be related to osteolysis and patient activity. 8 10 When damage to the bone and surrounding tissues is caused by MoM-THA, patients who undergo revision MoM-THA may develop secondary damage to the joints, and a high rate of postoperative complications is expected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%