High-resolution velocity estimation from surface-based common-offset GPR reflection data

Abstract

Summary Surface-based common-offset ground-penetrating radar (GPR) reflection profiling is a popular geophysical exploration technique for obtaining high-resolution images of the shallow subsurface in a cost-effective manner. One drawback of this technique is that, without complementary borehole information in form of dielectric permittivity and/or porosity logs along the profile, it is currently not possible to obtain reliable estimates of the high-frequency electromagnetic velocity distribution of the probed subsurface region. This is problematic because adequate knowledge of the velocity is needed for accurate imaging and depth conversion of the data, as well as for quantifying the distribution of soil water content. To overcome this issue, we have developed a novel methodology for estimating the detailed subsurface velocity structure from common-offset GPR reflection measurements, which does not require additional conditioning information. The proposed approach combines two key components: Diffraction analysis is used to infer the smooth, large-scale component of the velocity distribution, whereas the superimposed small-scale fluctuations are inferred via inversion of the reflected wavefield. We test and validate our method on two synthetic datasets having increasing degrees of complexity and realism before applying it to a field example from the Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site (BHRS), where independent control data in the form of neutron-neutron porosity logs are available for validation. The results obtained demonstrate the viability and robustness of the proposed approach. Further, due to its efficiency, both in terms of field effort and computational cost, the method can be readily extended to 3D, which further enhances its attractiveness compared to multi-offset-based GPR velocity estimation techniques.

Fast 3D ground penetrating radar simulations for glaciers

“…In the same way, surface multiples, which are events that are reflected twice in the subsurface with a reflection at the air-ice interface in between before being recorded, will also be absent. To our knowledge, such secondary scattering is rather rare in GPR data, as evidenced by the great success of single-scatteringbased algorithms for the processing and analysis of GPR data (Irving et al, 2009;Schmelzbach et al, 2012;Xu et al, 2020Xu et al, , 2021Liu et al, 2022).…”

Analysis of 2D and 3D GPR data interpretation using continuous wavelet transforms: Case study from an archaeological test site

“…The wavelet transform technique is a well-known method for analyzing gravity and magnetic data from wells (Goyal and Tiwari, 2014;Ehsan et al, 2018). There are only a few studies that use the wavelet transform to detect interfaces or discontinuities in GPR data (Abd El-Raouf et al, 2021;Liu et al, 2022).…”