High‐resolution topography and anthropogenic feature extraction: testing geomorphometric parameters in floodplains

Abstract

In floodplains, anthropogenic features such as levees or road scarps, control and influence flows. An up-to-date and accurate digital data about these features are deeply needed for irrigation and flood mitigation purposes. Nowadays, LiDAR Digital Terrain Models (DTMs) covering large areas are available for public authorities, and there is a widespread interest in the application of such models for the automatic or semiautomatic recognition of features. The automatic recognition of levees and road scarps from these models can offer a quick and accurate method to improve topographic databases for large-scale applications. In mountainous contexts, geomorphometric indicators derived from DTMs have been proven to be reliable for feasible applications, and the use of statistical operators as thresholds showed a high reliability to identify features. The goal of this research is to test if similar approaches can be feasible also in floodplains. Three different parameters are tested at different scales on LiDAR DTM. The boxplot is applied to identify an objective threshold for feature extraction, and a filtering procedure is proposed to improve the quality of the extractions. This analysis, in line with other works for different environments, underlined (1) how statistical parameters can offer an objective threshold to identify features with varying shapes, size and height; (2) that the effectiveness of topographic parameters to identify anthropogenic features is related to the dimension of the investigated areas. The analysis also showed that the shape of the investigated area has not much influence on the quality of the results. While the effectiveness of residual topography had already been proven, the proposed study underlined how the use of entropy can anyway provide good extractions, with an overall quality comparable to the one offered by residual topography, and with the only limitation that the extracted features are slightly wider than the investigated one

Geomorphic analysis of transient landscapes in the Sierra Madre de Chiapas and Maya Mountains (northern Central America): implications for the North American–Caribbean–Cocos plate boundary

“…Otherwise, computed values will reflect local-scale variations in relief such as hillslopes. Smallest window scales, aside from being noisy due to highfrequency signals, can also be more influenced by errors (e.g, Albani et al, 2004;Tarolli et al, 2012;Sofia et al, 2013Sofia et al, , 2014. In the present case, a 15 km window allows for the effect of the drainage system to be filtered out as the window size represents an area that will include several valleys and ridges (Andreani et al, 2014).…”

Bumps in river profiles: uncertainty assessment and smoothing using quantile regression techniques

“…Finally, DEMs are simply unable to represent embankment underpasses such as bridges or culverts (Lindsay and Dhun, 2015). Unless manually or automatically removed, these features appear as positive excursions in the longitudinal river profiles, particularly at high spatial resolution (lidar-derived DEMs) and in human-altered landscapes (Schwanghart et al, 2013;Sofia et al, 2013).…”

Automated Extraction and Mapping for Desert Wadis from Landsat Imagery in Arid West Asia

“…A small window size always seems to be sufficient for recognizing the objects of interest, while a large window size often omits the linear objects in satellite images. Therefore, an iterative process for different window sizes is regarded as an effective solution [53,54]. The parameter k2 of the local adaptive threshold segmentation in wide wadi extraction also affected the wide wadis performance.…”