2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2005.03966
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-resolution spectroscopy of a surge in an emerging flux region

M. Verma,
C. Denker,
A. Diercke
et al.

Abstract: Aims. The regular pattern of quiet-Sun magnetic fields was disturbed by newly emerging magnetic flux, which led a day later to two homologous surges after renewed flux emergence, affecting all atmospheric layers. Hence, simultaneous observations in different atmospheric heights are needed to understand the interaction of rising flux tubes with the surrounding plasma, in particular by exploiting the important diagnostic capabilities provided by the strong chromospheric Hα line regarding morphology and energetic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameters are derived by inverting the contrast profiles of the structure, which are taken in reference to an average absorption profile taken from a nearby quiet-Sun region, free from prominent absorption structures (see e.g., black line in Figure 5a). Typical structures that have been treated with CM are chromospheric mottles or fibrils see (e.g., Tsiropoula & Schmieder 1997;Tziotziou et al 2003), filaments (e.g., Kuckein et al 2016), arch-filament systems (González Manrique et al 2017) and surges (Verma et al 2020). In this study, as already mentioned, contrast profiles were processed by applying an iterative PCA process to remove noise before feeding the CM inversion scheme.…”
Section: Cloud Model Analysis Of the Minifilamentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The parameters are derived by inverting the contrast profiles of the structure, which are taken in reference to an average absorption profile taken from a nearby quiet-Sun region, free from prominent absorption structures (see e.g., black line in Figure 5a). Typical structures that have been treated with CM are chromospheric mottles or fibrils see (e.g., Tsiropoula & Schmieder 1997;Tziotziou et al 2003), filaments (e.g., Kuckein et al 2016), arch-filament systems (González Manrique et al 2017) and surges (Verma et al 2020). In this study, as already mentioned, contrast profiles were processed by applying an iterative PCA process to remove noise before feeding the CM inversion scheme.…”
Section: Cloud Model Analysis Of the Minifilamentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are attributed to strong downflows after the eruption and indicate that the corresponding spectral profiles are not only redshifted but also highly asymmetric. Since the BVHM is sensitive to motions lower in the chromosphere (Dineva et al 2020;Verma et al 2020), these strong downflows are attributed to the interaction of the minifilament material with the chromosphere below. In the following, we will discuss these profiles in detail and the regions where they occurred.…”
Section: Slit-reconstructed Maps Of Hα Spectral Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%