1991
DOI: 10.1021/bk-1991-0464.ch002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Resolution Separation of Rare Cell Types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For fabricating transplantable tissues in vitro, effective cell separation methods that can provide an adequate purity, yield, and function after separation have been desired, because the purity of cells or individual cell contents in cocultured cells is important for fabricating functional tissues. , To date, the various types of cell separation methods have been developed such as field-flow fractionation (FFF), , affinity adsorption, , and flow sorting. , Especially, fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and magnetic cell sorting (MACS) are widely used as precise cell separation methods. However, these cell separation methods require the modification of cell surfaces with fluorescent antibody or magnetic particles, leading to a serious problem upon the transplantation of separated cells to human body. Therefore, a cell separation method that requires no modification on the surface of cell is preferable for using separated cells for transplantation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For fabricating transplantable tissues in vitro, effective cell separation methods that can provide an adequate purity, yield, and function after separation have been desired, because the purity of cells or individual cell contents in cocultured cells is important for fabricating functional tissues. , To date, the various types of cell separation methods have been developed such as field-flow fractionation (FFF), , affinity adsorption, , and flow sorting. , Especially, fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and magnetic cell sorting (MACS) are widely used as precise cell separation methods. However, these cell separation methods require the modification of cell surfaces with fluorescent antibody or magnetic particles, leading to a serious problem upon the transplantation of separated cells to human body. Therefore, a cell separation method that requires no modification on the surface of cell is preferable for using separated cells for transplantation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20 To date, the various types of cell separation methods have been developed such as field-flow fractionation (FFF), 21,22 affinity adsorption, 23,24 and flow sorting. 25,26 Especially, fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and magnetic cell sorting (MACS) are widely used as precise cell separation methods. 25−27 However, these cell separation methods require the modification of cell surfaces with fluorescent antibody or magnetic particles, leading to a serious problem upon the transplantation of separated cells to human body.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis and/or sorting of rare cell subpopulations to a high degree of purity by flow cytometry (FCM)/cell sorting techniques has been described in a variety of biomedical applications (2)(3)(4)(6)(7)(8)11,13,15,18,22). FCM techniques can also be used to enrich samples of more commonly occurring cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, individual beads from a library having high fluorescence intensities can be easily detected by flow cytometry for the ultimate sorting of aptamer beads into microcentrifuge tubes for rapid PCR based sequencing [113]. The James Leary's custom-built HiReCS flow cytometer instrumentation constitutes a high-throughput screening device that can analyze beads at rates in excess of 10 4 beads per second [114][115][116][117][118], allowing the analysis of a very small fraction of fluorescence aptamer beads to be detected and sorted from large libraries (e.g. >10 8 beads).…”
Section: Screening Of Bead Based S-odn or S 2 -Odn Librariesmentioning
confidence: 99%