2013
DOI: 10.4311/2011es0248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Resolution Seismic Reflection Methods to Detect Near Surface Tuff-Cavities: A Case Study in the Neapolitan Area, Italy

Abstract: The Neapolitan region of Italy is plagued by the presence of shallow manmade cavities in lithoid tuffs that cause problems for communities because they produce building damages and loss of human lives. A high resolution P-wave seismic-reflection technique was successfully used to define a cavity 6 m by 10 m in horizontal dimensions and with a height of about 6 m located in a tuff layer 10 to 19 m below ground level. Such a cavity was located at Afragola (near Naples) where the local geology is typical of the N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to the fact that the cavity is small compared to the wavelength or because the soil stratification has a bigger influence on traveltime compared to cavity perturbation. The principle of seismic reflection can be effective for imaging deep cavities but for shallow depths, that is the subsurface geotechnical zone, the events reflected are often masked by surface waves (Miller et al 1991;Fiore et al 2013;Sloan et al 2015). This last point makes the extraction of cavity-related information from raw data difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to the fact that the cavity is small compared to the wavelength or because the soil stratification has a bigger influence on traveltime compared to cavity perturbation. The principle of seismic reflection can be effective for imaging deep cavities but for shallow depths, that is the subsurface geotechnical zone, the events reflected are often masked by surface waves (Miller et al 1991;Fiore et al 2013;Sloan et al 2015). This last point makes the extraction of cavity-related information from raw data difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seismic methods are the most suitable to delineate geological boundaries and the external geometry of the aquifer. Gravity can be used to identify large voids, such as potential sinkholes, as well as caves and major karst conduits [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Moreover, geoelectrical and electromagnetic methods, by determining lateral and vertical variations in subsurface electrical resistivity, are useful to identify geological and hydrogeological features, such as caves, fractures, and sinkholes, and are particularly sensitive to the presence of subsurface water [16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different types of waves can be used in such studies, such as reflected (Cook ; Branham and Steeples ; Miller and Steeples ; Kourkafas and Goulty ; Piwakowski, Waletet and Moreaux ; Di Fiore et al . ), refracted (Engelsfeld, Šumanovac and Pavin ), surface (Leparoux, Bitri and Grandjean ; Xu and Butt ; Kaslilar et al . ), channel (Yancey et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%