Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society&Expogef 2019
DOI: 10.22564/16cisbgf2019.313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-resolution Seismic imaging in the Santos Basin, Brazil and its impact on Salt Mechanics

Abstract: Contents of this paper were reviewed by the Technical Committee of the 16 th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society and do not necessarily represent any position of the SBGf, its officers or members. Electronic reproduction or storage of any part of this paper for commercial purposes without the written consent of the Brazilian Geophysical Society is prohibited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many authors propose an extension‐driven model in which the Albian Gap (AG) (and overlying rollover) formed due to post‐Albian gravity‐driven extension accommodated by slip on a large, counter‐regional, salt‐detached listric normal fault, the Cabo Frio Fault (CFF, e.g., Cobbold & Szatmari, 1991; Davison et al., 2012; Demercian et al., 1993; Guerra & Underhill, 2012; Mohriak et al., 1995; Rowan & Ratcliff, 2012; Rowan et al., 2022). Others propose an expulsion‐driven model in which the AG was established earlier, during the Albian and post‐Albian, with the post‐Albian deformation controlled by differential loading, vertical subsidence, and basinward salt expulsion in the absence of significant lateral extension (Ge et al., 1997; Gemmer et al., 2005; Jackson et al., 2015; Krezcek et al., 2007; Lebit et al., 2019; Szatmari et al., 1996). Recently, Pichel and Jackson (2020) showed that the geometry and kinematics of the AG vary along‐strike and propose that both post‐Albian extension and expulsion play a significant role in its evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many authors propose an extension‐driven model in which the Albian Gap (AG) (and overlying rollover) formed due to post‐Albian gravity‐driven extension accommodated by slip on a large, counter‐regional, salt‐detached listric normal fault, the Cabo Frio Fault (CFF, e.g., Cobbold & Szatmari, 1991; Davison et al., 2012; Demercian et al., 1993; Guerra & Underhill, 2012; Mohriak et al., 1995; Rowan & Ratcliff, 2012; Rowan et al., 2022). Others propose an expulsion‐driven model in which the AG was established earlier, during the Albian and post‐Albian, with the post‐Albian deformation controlled by differential loading, vertical subsidence, and basinward salt expulsion in the absence of significant lateral extension (Ge et al., 1997; Gemmer et al., 2005; Jackson et al., 2015; Krezcek et al., 2007; Lebit et al., 2019; Szatmari et al., 1996). Recently, Pichel and Jackson (2020) showed that the geometry and kinematics of the AG vary along‐strike and propose that both post‐Albian extension and expulsion play a significant role in its evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seismic reflection data utilized in much of these studies mostly did not penetrate below 14 km depth and hence the deep crustal structure of the predominantly counterregional normal Cabo Frio Faults (CFF) against which the AG terminates -is not fully understood. Based on highresolution enhanced seismic imaging of salt and pre-salt sections and well data analysis, Lebit et al (2019) found little or no indication of lateral movement along the base of the Aptian layered evaporite sequence or evidence for a distinguished detachment fault as suggested by common models accounting for the genesis of the AG (e.g., Cobbold & Szatmari, 1991;Davison et al, 2012;Demercian et al, 1993;Guerra & Underhill, 2012;Mohriak et al, 1995;Rowan & Ratcliff, 2012). It may therefore be instructive to investigate the structure of the proposed CFF zone (Figures 1 and 2) at depth using a non-seismic deep imaging method like magnetotellurics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%