High-Resolution (SAR) Altimetry Processing on Demand for Cryosat-2 and Sentinel-3 at ESA&amp;#8217;s Altimetry Virtual Lab

Benvéniste, Jérôme; Dinardo, Salvatore; Buchhaupt, Christopher; Scagliola, Michele; Passaro, Marcello; Fenoglio-Marc, Luciana; Sabatino, G.; Restano, Marco; Ambrózio, Américo; Abis, Beniamino; Orrù, Carla

doi:10.5194/iahs2022-519

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We created the SAMOSA++ dataset with the online processor SARvatore for Sentinel-3, hosted on the ESA G-POD (currently discontinued); the current method to obtain the same data is to access the processor on the EarthConsole [26]. We used the standard coastal processing scheme (double radar receiving window size, Hamming window in the coastal zone, and FFT zero-padding).…”

Section: Altimeter Productsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of Altimetry Corrections of Sentinel-3A Sea Surface Height in the Coastal Zone of the Northwest Atlantic

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Corrections to altimeter-measured sea surface height anomalies (SSHA) have a larger proportional effect for synthetic aperture radar (SAR) altimetry than conventional, pulse-limited altimetry because of lower range noise. Here, we quantified the impact of the current generation of altimeter corrections in the coastal zone of the Northwest Atlantic, a region with significant dynamic activity. In this study, we used the sea level variance analysis to determine the change in variance for the altimeter corrections—range, geophysical, and mean surface—compared to the baseline. We also evaluated the performance of two coastal retrackers, ALES (empirical) and SAMOSA++ (fully analytical), against the SSHA from the Radar Altimeter Database System (RADS), which uses the standard SAR retracker. Tide corrections caused the largest change in sea level variance, followed by wet tropospheric corrections and sea state bias. Most non-standard altimeter corrections failed to reduce the sea level variance and performed markedly worse closer to the coast. Coastal retrackers showed a higher deviation from the standard SSHA closer to the coast, especially when the backscatter coefficient was high and the significant wave height was low. We conclude that further development of coastal corrections is needed. Contrary to our prior expectation, we found that standard altimetry corrections appear to perform as well as alternative more advanced/tailored corrections.

show abstract

Section: Altimeter Productsmentioning

confidence: 99%