1997
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.56.16003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-resolution photoelectron emission spectroscopy of surface states on Ni(111)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
47
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
47
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The two dominant peaks at binding energies of 0.54 eV and 1.37 eV should correspond to the Λ 3 and Λ 1 bulk d-bands, respectively. On close inspection, the already known surface states [7][8][9][10][11][12] can be easily observed: (i) S 1 with a binding energy of 0.025 eV and (ii) S 2 at a binding energy of 0.28 eV. A first visual search for the theoretically expected surface state, S 3 , does not seem to be successful, but we clearly observe that the Λ 1 peak is much broader than the Λ 3 bulk band.…”
Section: A Clean Vs Rapidly Hydrogen Passivated Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two dominant peaks at binding energies of 0.54 eV and 1.37 eV should correspond to the Λ 3 and Λ 1 bulk d-bands, respectively. On close inspection, the already known surface states [7][8][9][10][11][12] can be easily observed: (i) S 1 with a binding energy of 0.025 eV and (ii) S 2 at a binding energy of 0.28 eV. A first visual search for the theoretically expected surface state, S 3 , does not seem to be successful, but we clearly observe that the Λ 1 peak is much broader than the Λ 3 bulk band.…”
Section: A Clean Vs Rapidly Hydrogen Passivated Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In real non-ideal crystal surfaces the distinction between Shockley and Tamm surface states is sometimes blurred, and can only be differentiated by the mathematical approximation used in their derivation [2][3][4] . On Ni(111) two different surface states near normal emission, S 1 and S 2 , are known [7][8][9][10][11][12] . S 1 is the surface state closest to the Fermi energy with an electron-like (upward) dispersion (maximum binding energy ∼50 meV).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only recently a related surface state splitting was inferred from scanning tunneling spectroscopy [4]. Though, this splitting was not present everywhere on the surface, and its Fermi vectors did not correspond to the previous inverse photoemission [3] nor photoemission experiments [5]. Also, spin integrated state of the art high resolution photoemission [6] and corresponding scanning probe experiments did not resolve this issue [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The electronic properties of the constituent parts, the (111) surface of the 3d band ferromagnet nickel [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] and the chemically inert insulator boron nitride (BN) [9][10][11] have already been thoroughly explored. h-BN/Ni(111) was further employed as a substrate for the investigation of C 60 molecules, because the h-BN layer electronically decouples the molecules from the substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%