2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00455-019-10023-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry and Impedance: Protocols and Metrics—Recommendations of a High-Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry International Working Group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
113
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pharyngoesophageal junction motility during swallowing is traditionally difficult to explore, even using the most recent technology, including videofluoroscopy and HRM coupled with intraluminal impedance recording manometry. This relies on the lack of reliable objective measures and/or limited interrater reliability to assess upper esophageal sphincter resting pressure and opening 65,66 . The recent development of FLIP measurement provided a new tool to assess dynamic change of pharyngoesophageal junction geometry and distensibility, especially during swallowing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pharyngoesophageal junction motility during swallowing is traditionally difficult to explore, even using the most recent technology, including videofluoroscopy and HRM coupled with intraluminal impedance recording manometry. This relies on the lack of reliable objective measures and/or limited interrater reliability to assess upper esophageal sphincter resting pressure and opening 65,66 . The recent development of FLIP measurement provided a new tool to assess dynamic change of pharyngoesophageal junction geometry and distensibility, especially during swallowing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was interesting to note that, unlike velopharyngeal and mesopharyngeal contractile integrals, hypopharyngeal contractile integral (HPCI) was not altered by any form of sensory stimulation in this study. It has been suggested that epiglottic inversion during swallowing can alter HPCI measures (4). Additionally, contractile integrals or pressure changes over space and time may not be as pertinent to the hypopharyngeal phase of swallowing compared to the velopharyngeal and mesopharyngeal stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be possible that the method for calculating this metric could be influencing this finding (see Table 1). Use of maximum admittance based on impedance measures would be worthy of investigation in future research (4). No previous research was found evaluating the effect of cold on either duration or extent of UES opening as outcomes from previous research related to swallow safety, pharyngeal response time and pharyngeal retention (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CC v3.0 assesses three key manometric parameters looking at Phases 3‐4 of esophageal bolus transit: (a) integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) measuring the post‐deglutition EGJ relaxation; and (b) distal contractile integral (DCI) assessing the amplitude and duration of esophageal contractions, and (c) distal latency (DL) assessing the smooth muscle contractility in the mid‐ and distal esophagus 5 . Some studies suggest that impairment of UES relaxation (Phase 1 of esophageal transit) is a risk factor for aspiration in patients with dysphagia, and the High‐Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry International Working Group recently standardized UES measurements and reporting 6,7 . There is paucity of data on the proximal esophageal striated muscle contractility or Phase 2 of esophageal bolus transit in patients with symptoms of esophageal motility disorders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%