2010
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2010-0226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomographic Imaging of Cortical and Trabecular Bone Microarchitecture in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Abstract: The results of this pilot investigation provide a potential explanation for the inability of standard BMD measures to explain the elevated fracture incidence in patients with T2DM. The findings suggest that T2DM may be associated with impaired resistance to bending loads due to inefficient redistribution of bone mass, characterized by loss of intracortical bone offset by an elevation in trabecular bone density.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
326
4
9

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 414 publications
(360 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
21
326
4
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors also reported no difference in indices of bone strength between groups, which might be attributed to the sample size in this study. While variables of trabecular bone microarchitecture and indices of bone strength at the radius were not found to be different in this previous pQCT study, Burghardt and colleagues did report a greater number of cortical pores and greater cortical bone pore volume at the radius (47). Similar findings have been reported in men with type 2 DM (48).…”
Section: Pritchard Et Alsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors also reported no difference in indices of bone strength between groups, which might be attributed to the sample size in this study. While variables of trabecular bone microarchitecture and indices of bone strength at the radius were not found to be different in this previous pQCT study, Burghardt and colleagues did report a greater number of cortical pores and greater cortical bone pore volume at the radius (47). Similar findings have been reported in men with type 2 DM (48).…”
Section: Pritchard Et Alsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Moreover, some suggest that comprehensive imaging studies aiming to determine histomorphometric differences between groups should have at least 50 participants per group to provide sufficient power (19). Burghardt and colleagues also found no differences in radius microarchitectural indices, including Tb.N, in a smaller pilot study in women with type 2 DM and age-and height-matched healthy controls using pQCT (47). The authors also reported no difference in indices of bone strength between groups, which might be attributed to the sample size in this study.…”
Section: Pritchard Et Almentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The reasons for the increased risk for fracture in T2DM patients are not clear [6,10]. Increased cortical porosity of distal radius or distal tibia has been invoked as one possible factor [11][12][13]. However, it is hard to explain how individuals with T2DM can exhibit high porosity [14][15][16][17], since increased cortical porosity reflects increased bone turnover from intracortical surfaces lining the Haversian canals and the endocortical surfaces adjacent to the marrow cavity [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is decreased cortical thickness and volumetric BMD (vBMD), with increased cortical porosity and pore size in T2DM [44] patients with microvascular disease (retinopathy, neuropathy or nephropathy). These changes are associated with decreased bone strength by finite element analysis [44,45] and are greater in T2DM patients with previous fractures [46], suggesting that they may be clinically significant contributors to fracture risk.…”
Section: Type 2 Diabetes Fracture and Bmdmentioning
confidence: 99%