BACKROUND AND PURPOSE:The optimal imaging method for the diagnosis of VAD remains undefined. Our aim was to evaluate the added value of HR-MR imaging for the diagnosis of VAD.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:We retrospectively extracted 35 consecutive patients suspected of having acute VAD who had the following: 1) a focal lumen abnormality of the VA on CE-MRA, 2) HR-MR imaging during the initial hospital stay, and 3) clinical and imaging follow-up within 6 months. Two neurologists classified patients as either VAD (group A) or non-VAD (group B) by reviewing all the available data at hospital discharge, except HR-MR imaging data. On HR-MR imaging, 2 radiologists searched for signs of acute VAD. The 2 classifications were compared. In case of discordance, CE-MRA follow-up and axial fat-suppressed T1WI, used to obtain supportive evidence for or against VAD, were considered as the standard of reference.
RESULTS:In 4/18 patients in group A, HR-MR imaging did not demonstrate any signs of acute VAD and perivertebral signal-intensity changes were attributed to venous plexus, with an unchanged lumen on follow-up. In 4/17 patients in group B, HR-MRI demonstrated a mural hematoma, with lumen normalization on follow-up CE-MRA.
CONCLUSIONS:Our results encourage the use of HR-MR imaging as a second-line diagnostic tool in the event of suspicion of acute VAD and doubtful findings on standard imaging.ABBREVIATIONS: CE-MRA ϭ contrast-enhanced MR angiography; CI ϭ confidence interval; DSA ϭ digital subtraction angiography; DUS ϭ Doppler ultrasonography examination; DWI ϭ diffusionweighted imaging; HR ϭ high resolution; NIHSS ϭ National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; PDWI ϭ proton attenuationϪweighted imaging; T1WI ϭ T1-weighted imaging; T2WI ϭ T2-weighted imaging; TE eff ϭ effective echo-time; TOF ϭ time of flight; V2 and V3 ϭ the second and third VA segments; VA ϭ vertebral artery; VAD ϭ VA dissection