2009
DOI: 10.1016/s1001-0742(08)62341-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-resolution modeling and evaluation of ozone air quality of Osaka using MM5-CMAQ system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that the coarser resolutions are adequate for simulating regional averages. Non-linear effects have been reported in previous model studies at the kilometer scale of urban areas (Kumar and Russell, 1996;Chock et al, 2002;Shrestha et al, 2009;Tie et al, 2010) or pollution plumes (Henderson et al, 2010;Valin et al, 2011), and these small-scale effects are not resolved here even at 0.25 • × 0.3125 • resolution. Nevertheless, the general ability of the GEOS-Chem simulation to capture the variance in the SEAC 4 RS observations implies that small-scale effects are not of major importance at least for the Southeast US.…”
Section: Chemical Variability and Biasmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This suggests that the coarser resolutions are adequate for simulating regional averages. Non-linear effects have been reported in previous model studies at the kilometer scale of urban areas (Kumar and Russell, 1996;Chock et al, 2002;Shrestha et al, 2009;Tie et al, 2010) or pollution plumes (Henderson et al, 2010;Valin et al, 2011), and these small-scale effects are not resolved here even at 0.25 • × 0.3125 • resolution. Nevertheless, the general ability of the GEOS-Chem simulation to capture the variance in the SEAC 4 RS observations implies that small-scale effects are not of major importance at least for the Southeast US.…”
Section: Chemical Variability and Biasmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…For example, the ability of comprehensive, multipollutant air quality models to run for longer periods at grid resolutions of 1-5 km is increasing (e.g., Makar et al, 2010;Shrestha et al, 2009). Output from these higher-resolution models may eventually lead to multipollutant information relevant to chronic exposure estimation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grid resolutions finer than 1 km are typically not used, because of the excessive computational resource requirements, and sometimes because the parameterizations in a particular model may not be adequate for grid cell sizes lower than 1 km. Examples of some CMAQ and CAMx nested grid applications with the finest grid resolution at 1 km are provided in [23][24][25][26][27]. However, even a resolution of 1 km is inadequate to resolve sub-grid scale features, such as plumes from elevated point sources, whose initial dimensions are of the order of a few tens of meters.…”
Section: Nested Grid Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%