2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-009-0204-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-resolution lidar-based landslide hazard mapping and modeling, UCSF Parnassus Campus, San Francisco, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the great extent and the complexity of the involved areas, we prevalently operated by exploiting LiDAR data. This procedure is confirmed by several authors who analysed ground surface processes by means of high-resolution DTMs (Glenn et al 2006;Ardizzone et al 2007;Haneberg et al 2009;Tarolli 2014;Pirasteh and Li 2016), also in forested areas (Eeckhaut et al 2007;Razak et al 2013;Chen et al 2014) and for large territories (Eeckhaut et al 2007). We employed a visual analysis methodology combining the highresolution DTM and orthoimages.…”
Section: Landslides Identification and Validationsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Due to the great extent and the complexity of the involved areas, we prevalently operated by exploiting LiDAR data. This procedure is confirmed by several authors who analysed ground surface processes by means of high-resolution DTMs (Glenn et al 2006;Ardizzone et al 2007;Haneberg et al 2009;Tarolli 2014;Pirasteh and Li 2016), also in forested areas (Eeckhaut et al 2007;Razak et al 2013;Chen et al 2014) and for large territories (Eeckhaut et al 2007). We employed a visual analysis methodology combining the highresolution DTM and orthoimages.…”
Section: Landslides Identification and Validationsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This study demonstrates improvements provided by ALS-DEM for hazard mapping. Along the same line, Haneberg et al (2009) have shown convincing results for shallow landsliding, coupling an infinite slope model with geomorphic characterizations using an ALS-DEM.…”
Section: Alsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Despite modern technological advances, and the availability of new satellite products, the visual interpretation of airborne photographs is still the most common method to obtain landslide information though several other sources of information that may be used such as optical remote sensing images and LiDARderived topographic information (Ardizzone et al, 2007;van den Eeckhaut et al, 2007;Haneberg et al, 2009;Razak et al, 2013;Martha et al, 2010;van den Eeckhaut et al, 2012). Images acquired by synthetic aperture radar (SAR) satellite sensors are also considered as a powerful source of information, mainly for the recognition of slow-moving landslides (Singhroy and Molch, 2004;Zhao et al, 2012).…”
Section: Published By Copernicus Publications On Behalf Of the Europementioning
confidence: 99%