2016
DOI: 10.14358/pers.83.1.63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-resolution Land Cover and Impervious Surface Classifications in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area with NAIP Imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is available at the spatial resolution of 0.6 to 2 meters with very low cloud coverage and consists of repeat images during the growing season with two or three year cycles for more than 15 years [1]. It has been a unique choice for a variety of geospatial mapping applications, such as analysis of land cover and land use change [2][3][4], evaluation of ecosystem services [5][6][7], monitoring of forest health [8][9][10][11], and assessment of urban green infrastructure [12,13]. The NAIP imagery will likely continue to be the one of the best data sources for many research and operational efforts that need high-resolution multispectral imagery for feature extraction, change detection, or collection of ground truth for validate coarse-resolution satellite products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is available at the spatial resolution of 0.6 to 2 meters with very low cloud coverage and consists of repeat images during the growing season with two or three year cycles for more than 15 years [1]. It has been a unique choice for a variety of geospatial mapping applications, such as analysis of land cover and land use change [2][3][4], evaluation of ecosystem services [5][6][7], monitoring of forest health [8][9][10][11], and assessment of urban green infrastructure [12,13]. The NAIP imagery will likely continue to be the one of the best data sources for many research and operational efforts that need high-resolution multispectral imagery for feature extraction, change detection, or collection of ground truth for validate coarse-resolution satellite products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that have used NAIP imagery at large extents have addressed this challenge by limiting classification to a small number of classes that address specific land cover questions [11] in combination with the use of specialized computer hardware [10]. However, due to recent advances in image analysis software, we are now able to conduct broad extent fine resolution land cover classification using standard computer hardware more efficiently than was previously possible [34].…”
Section: Imagery and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In forest management, land cover classifications are frequently used to inform management activities such as timber harvest [6], forest restoration [7], fire risk mitigation [8], and preservation of rare habitats [9]. From land cover classification datasets, relevant objectives such as locating forested and non-forested areas [10] or determining the proportion of impervious surface occupying landscape [11] can be quickly addressed. Land cover classifications can also be used as a component of more complex analyses of landscape characteristics [12] and can be used to describe important characteristics of forest and woodland ecosystems, such as percent canopy cover, understory composition within open forests, and the degree of fragmentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature Analyst, an object-based classifier that makes use of not only spectral, but also spatial information in the imagery, was used. It was found that for remote sensing images with a low spectral variation, especially for the historical B&W aerial photography, the object-based approach and hierarchical learning process provided by the Feature Analyst were very useful [29,30]. Training polygons for forest and agriculture land-cover classes were carefully digitized from the high spatial resolution airborne imagery for both years, as they are the two prevailing land-cover types shown in the changed areas of stream networks.…”
Section: Field Survey and Land Cover Change Analysis In A Focused Stumentioning
confidence: 99%