2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High resolution in-vivo diffusion imaging of the human hippocampus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although prior literature contends that the hippocampus may be particularly vulnerable to anoxia, 3 we did not identify preferential ABI in the hippocampus. However, it possible that these clinical diffusion-weighted scans, which poorly discriminate mesial temporal structures, 45 had insufficient resolution to fully assess hippocampal ABI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although prior literature contends that the hippocampus may be particularly vulnerable to anoxia, 3 we did not identify preferential ABI in the hippocampus. However, it possible that these clinical diffusion-weighted scans, which poorly discriminate mesial temporal structures, 45 had insufficient resolution to fully assess hippocampal ABI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another relevant limiting point refers to the complex structure of the hippocampus itself and its consequences for the optimal number of clusters. The human hippocampus is characterized by angulation and a variable number of digitations (Ding and Van Hoesen 2015;Treit et al 2018;Wisse et al 2012). Both features could have influenced our results in terms of the optimal number of clusters.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the limited spatial resolution of MRI data, we may have missed differences in connectivity profiles of conflated subfields in the posterior hippocampus hence leading to a single tail cluster in the present study. Additionally, hippocampal gyrification, known as digitations, vary between individuals and have been previously discussed as a possible factor for inter-individual variability in the hippocampus (Chang et al 2018;DeKraker et al 2018;Ding and Van Hoesen 2015;Treit et al 2018). How this affects cognition and psychopathology (Oppenheim et al 1998) and whether different digitations have different connectivity profiles and hence could influence clustering pattern is still unclear.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though prior literature contends that the hippocampus may be particularly vulnerable to anoxia 3 , we did not identify preferential ABI in the hippocampus. However, it possible that these clinical diffusion weighted scans, which poorly discriminate mesial temporal structures 48 , had insufficient resolution to fully assess hippocampal ABI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%