2000
DOI: 10.1002/1522-2683(200011)21:17<3558::aid-elps3558>3.0.co;2-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-resolution electrophoretic procedures for the identification of fiveEimeria species from chickens, and detection of population variation

Abstract: To overcome limitations of conventional approaches for the identification of Eimeria species of chickens, we have established high resolution electrophoretic procedures using genetic markers in ribosomal DNA. The first and second internal transcribed spacer (ITS-1 and ITS-2) regions of ribosomal DNA were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from genomic DNA samples representing five species of Eimeria (E. acervulina, E. brunetti, E. maxima, E. necatrix and E. tenella), denatured and then subjected to d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
19
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(23 reference statements)
5
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The smallest amount of C. parvum genomic DNA detectable by amplification with primer set 18SiF-18SiR (pSSU) or YA56F-YA54R (pITS-2) and subsequent detection on agarose gels was estimated at 1 to 2 pg, which is comparable to that in a previous study of Eimeria species (Protozoa: family Eimeriidae) (35).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The smallest amount of C. parvum genomic DNA detectable by amplification with primer set 18SiF-18SiR (pSSU) or YA56F-YA54R (pITS-2) and subsequent detection on agarose gels was estimated at 1 to 2 pg, which is comparable to that in a previous study of Eimeria species (Protozoa: family Eimeriidae) (35).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…While the subgenotypic classification of the type 2 samples by DPGE was the same as that for SSCP analysis, ϳ30% less profile variation (9 instead 13 profiles) was detectable among the type 1 samples, which is attributable to a lack of length (rather than sequence) variation among some of the samples. These results reinforced the superior ability of SSCP to detect subtle nucleotide variation among molecules of the same length within an amplicon (13,35) and reflected the finding of increased sequence and length variability in pITS-2 within and among type 2 samples compared with type 1.…”
Section: Vol 69 2003supporting
confidence: 63%
“…Analysis of internal transcribed spacers (ITS-1 and ITS-2) permits discrimination of all species of the genus Eimeria, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or real-time PCR (Tsuji et al, 1997;Woods et al, 2000;Fernandez et al, 2003a;Morris and Gasser, 2006;Kawahara et al, 2008). Another marker that has also been used is the sequence-characterized amplified region, which was proposed by Fernandez et al (2003b); it allows distinguishing Eimeria species in individual or in multiplex PCR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, because this approach gave limited information about strain variation, further work was carried out to develop a test based on the use of the second ITS region. 25,27,[43][44][45] Universal probes for family (Eimeriidae) and genus (Eimeria) 28S rRNA (at the 3′ end) and 5.8S rRNA (at the 5′ end) sequences respectively flanking the second ITS region enabled identification of and discrimination between all seven species. It also made it possible to detect variation within a single Eimeria species.…”
Section: Targeted Pcr On Individual Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also made it possible to detect variation within a single Eimeria species. 44,45 Therefore, in addition to abolishing the need for isotopes, electrophoretic gels, and monospecific reference controls, the major advantage of this novel test was the ability to detect all seven Eimeria species and their genetic variants in a single PCR reaction. These universal primers were validated in testing two Eimeria species concurrently as well as field samples, and it was concluded by the authors that these tests are accurate, less laborious than previous tests, and cheap enough to be used for testing field samples in routine diagnostic laboratories.…”
Section: Targeted Pcr On Individual Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%