Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, 165 Scientific Results 2000
DOI: 10.2973/odp.proc.sr.165.009.2000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-resolution, downhole, and nondestructive core measurements from Sites 999 and 1001 in the Caribbean Sea: application to the Late Paleocene Thermal Maximum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
88
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection limit for iron for the XRF scanner used is 210 ppm (Richter et al 2006). Repeatability tests at the surface of split sediment core halves have shown that the error is smaller than 1% if the core surface is of high quality (Röhl and Abrams, 2000), which was the case for the scanned core sections of this study.…”
Section: Stable Isotope Measurements Ird and Fe Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The detection limit for iron for the XRF scanner used is 210 ppm (Richter et al 2006). Repeatability tests at the surface of split sediment core halves have shown that the error is smaller than 1% if the core surface is of high quality (Röhl and Abrams, 2000), which was the case for the scanned core sections of this study.…”
Section: Stable Isotope Measurements Ird and Fe Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The measurements were made on the CORTEX scanner at the Bremen Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP) core repository [Röhl and Abrams, 2000]. This automated scanning method allows for a rapid qualitative determination of the geochemical composition of the sediment in very high resolution [Jansen et al, 1992].…”
Section: X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A special emphasis was placed on the upper 31 m of the sediments because it is during this time interval (~80 kyr) that previous investigations indicate a change in the controls on climate at the site (Partridge, 2002). The XRF core scanner was used to measure major elements (e.g., Al, Si, S, K, Ca, Ti, Cl, and Fe) on split sediment cores as described in Richter et al (2006), Röhl and Abrams (2000) and Tjallingii et al (2007). This is a widely accepted, semi-quantitative, nondestructive core logging method that provides records of changing element intensities expressed in "total counts", reflecting the geochemical composition of the sediments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%