2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0143-8166(02)00214-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-resolution digital transmission microscopy—a Fourier holography approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lyophilized HAMLET and oleate-HAMLET were dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Secondary structure predictions were made using K2D3 (34) (35)(36)(37). The interference pattern (hologram) is recorded on a digital sensor and is used to reconstruct the amplitude and phase of the object (38,39).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lyophilized HAMLET and oleate-HAMLET were dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Secondary structure predictions were made using K2D3 (34) (35)(36)(37). The interference pattern (hologram) is recorded on a digital sensor and is used to reconstruct the amplitude and phase of the object (38,39).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There a numerical lens was also introduced to focus the image at varying distances. High resolution microscopy is possible using a relatively simple setup [100,101], and a detailed analysis of image formation in lensless digital Fourier holography is given in Ref. 91.…”
Section: Fourier Holographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be used to image solid samples in reflection, or, which is most common in the case of biological samples, to image transparent samples in transmittance. The most commonly used system for DHM today uses an optical setup common to that of a Mach-Zender interferometer, but with the reference light at a slight angle to the light passing through the sample, and the image calculation is then performed using a Fresnel approximation (Cuche et al, 1999) Varieties of the setup exist (Popescu et al, 2006;Gustafsson et al, 2004) and it is also sometimes given different names (Ikeda et al, 2005). There are also variations in the calculation of the actual recognizable image.…”
Section: Why Digital Holographic Microscopy?mentioning
confidence: 99%