2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2015.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High resolution characterization of the soil organic carbon depth profile in a soil landscape affected by erosion

Abstract: A B S T R A C TThe identification of soil management strategies as well as the evaluation of their effectiveness requires detailed information on the spatial and temporal patterns of soil organic carbon storage. High-resolution SOC profile data are generally not available and traditional methods for collecting these are time consuming and costly. Recent studies use geo-statistical approaches to assess the three-dimensional patterns of SOC storage. However, there is still a large discrepancy between the continu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Outlier values at both depths were also identified using the inter quartile range (IQR) relationship. These results are in agreement with the findings of various researchers who reported higher SOC contents at the surface soil in hilly watershed (Wang et al, 2010;Wen et al, 2015), mountainous landscape , terraced rice fields (Li et al, 2015), erosion affected landscape (Jague et al, 2016), as well as an altitudinal gradient in the mountainous region (Parras-Alcántara et al, 2015). Similar variation of soil organic carbon with depth, has also been reported by Bera et al (2016), under corn production systems with addition of various organic amendments.…”
Section: Distribution Of Soc In the Watershedsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Outlier values at both depths were also identified using the inter quartile range (IQR) relationship. These results are in agreement with the findings of various researchers who reported higher SOC contents at the surface soil in hilly watershed (Wang et al, 2010;Wen et al, 2015), mountainous landscape , terraced rice fields (Li et al, 2015), erosion affected landscape (Jague et al, 2016), as well as an altitudinal gradient in the mountainous region (Parras-Alcántara et al, 2015). Similar variation of soil organic carbon with depth, has also been reported by Bera et al (2016), under corn production systems with addition of various organic amendments.…”
Section: Distribution Of Soc In the Watershedsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This can be attributed to the fact that presence of SOM/SOC has been found to be beneficial for nutrient retention/recycling, soil productivity, water holding capacity, carbon sequestration (Prescott et al, 2000;Munson and Carey, 2004;Seely et al, 2010;Six and Paustian, 2014). Studying soil organic carbon on a regional or watershed scale invites special attention these days as it is considered a key parameter, playing central roles in various environmental issues such as climate regulation, food and water security (Jague et al, 2016). Quantifying and estimating spatial distribution of SOC is vital for evaluating various soil functions and aids in understanding different soil carbon sequestration processes (Venteris et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All models react in a similar range to an increased tracer content (i.e. In general, Pu-based, local erosion and deposition rates are in the range rates inferred from 137 Cs inventories at the same investigation area (Aldana Jague et al, 2016). The PDM approach and the depth function seem to show a slightly higher reactivity and are, thus, more sensitive to changes.…”
Section: Physical and Chemical Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Average annual temperature in the same period was 9.1°C, with 0.6 and 17.7°C as average winter and summer temperature (DWD Climate Data Center, ). The study site is part of the experimental CarboZALF‐D field (Sommer et al, ), which represents a landscape laboratory with a research focus on the feedbacks between erosion processes and carbon dynamics (Rieckh et al, ; Aldana Jague et al, ; Gerke et al, ; Hoffmann et al, ). Before the establishment of the CarboZALF‐D experimental site in 2009, an extensive coring – based on a GIS analysis of soil forming factors – took place in the surrounding Quillow catchment (165 km 2 ) to assure representativeness of the soil pattern at the regional scale.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%