2005
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.20738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High‐resolution analysis of 16q22.1 in breast carcinoma using DNA amplifiable probes (multiplex amplifiable probe hybridization technique) and immunohistochemistry

Abstract: Loss of the chromosomal material at 16q22.1 is one of the most frequent genetic aberrations found in both lobular and low-grade nonlobular invasive carcinoma of the breast, indicating the presence of a tumour suppressor gene (TSG) at this region in these tumours. However, the TSG (s) at the 16q22.1 in the more frequent nonlobular carcinomas is still unknown. Multiplex Amplifiable Probe Hybridisation (MAPH) is a simple, accurate and a high-resolution technique that provides an alternative approach to DNA copy-n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reproducibility is comparable to that of the bacterial artificial chromosome-based comparative genomic hybridization array (32,33 ) and better than the reproducibility of other methods such as multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis (34,35 ), multiplex amplification and probe hybridization analysis (36 ), and SYBR Green I-based real-time PCR analysis (30 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This reproducibility is comparable to that of the bacterial artificial chromosome-based comparative genomic hybridization array (32,33 ) and better than the reproducibility of other methods such as multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis (34,35 ), multiplex amplification and probe hybridization analysis (36 ), and SYBR Green I-based real-time PCR analysis (30 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Several genes including E-cadherin, CBFA2T3, CTCF, and WWOX have been evaluated as the candidates for the 16q tumor suppressor gene, although none of them has been convincingly established as the 16q gene (Berx et al 1996;Cleton-Jansen 2002;Cowin et al 2005;Rakha et al 2005;Watanabe et al 2003;van Wezel et al 2005). Recently, the ATmotif Binding Factor (ATBF1) gene was identiWed as a reasonable candidate for the 16q22 tumor suppressor gene based on its frequent mutations and functional inhibition of cell proliferation in prostate cancer (Sun et al 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using mCGH, Buerger et al [10] showed that lowgrade DCIS, TBC, and lobular invasive carcinoma can genetically be related (gain on 1q, loss on 16q), whereas high-grade ductal invasive carcinomas are more likely related to high-grade DCIS (gain on 11q13 and 17q12). 16q has been studied thoroughly in breast cancer, and many genes were suspected to be important tumor suppressor genes in IDCs [34,35]. In lobular invasive carcinoma, the loss on 16q clearly affects CDH1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%