2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2016.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-resolution age-depth chronology from tropical montane minerotrophic peat in the Sandynallah valley, Western Ghats, southern India: Analytical issues and implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potassium hydroxide digestion was repeated until the supernatant became translucent and less opaque. We limited potassium hydroxide digestion to ~500 ml per sample because even after this amount the supernatant did not become clear (Ramya Bala et al, 2016). Samples were washed to neutral pH with deionised water and then digested again with 1M HCl at 60°C for 10 min, and then washed again to neutral pH with deionised water.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potassium hydroxide digestion was repeated until the supernatant became translucent and less opaque. We limited potassium hydroxide digestion to ~500 ml per sample because even after this amount the supernatant did not become clear (Ramya Bala et al, 2016). Samples were washed to neutral pH with deionised water and then digested again with 1M HCl at 60°C for 10 min, and then washed again to neutral pH with deionised water.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the site is located in the tropical belt, peat is preserved in valleys in this mountain range due to cool temperatures (annual average 13.5 °C) and moderately high precipitation leading to water logging (annual average precipitation of about 1400 mm) (von Lengerke 1977). These tropical mountain ranges feature peat deposits dating back to >40,000 radiocarbon yr BP which have been studied extensively to reconstruct Late Quaternary vegetation and climate (Vasanthy 1988; Sukumar et al 1993; Sutra, Bonnefille, and Fontugne 1997; Rajagopalan et al, 1997; Ramya Bala 2015; Ramya Bala et al 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pit of ~1.8 m depth was dug close to a location from which a core (labelled as Core 1) had been previously taken and radiocarbon dated (Ramya Bala et al 2016), and peat samples collected as monoliths at regular intervals in a stainless-steel box of dimensions 15.6 cm x 9.3 cm x 3.0 cm. Thirteen samples were collected in zip lock bags, adjacent samples starting from the surface separated by ~2 cm, down to a depth of ~1.6 m. Sub-samples were freeze dried (Labconco bulk drier) and crushed into fine powder and stored.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each study site establishes its own age-depth model independently by obtaining separate radiocarbon dates for independently selected layers. Owing to "internal uncertainties" intrinsic in the radionuclide activity measurements using Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) and "external uncertainties" introduced by sample handling and age-depth modeling (Ramya Bala et al, 2016), the chronology-based proxy comparison of different studies might be subject to the influence of chronological uncertainties, which might eventually lead to incorrect "Cause-Consequence" evaluations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%