2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High resolution 3D ERT to help GPR data interpretation for researching archaeological items in a geologically complex subsurface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reasons this approach for 3D geoelectrical surveying is widespread in geophysical practice (Negri et al, 2008;Drahor et al, 2008;Aizebeokhai et al, 2010). In particular this 3D approach has been used into mapping the structure of different waste disposal sites (Dahlin et al, 2002;Chambers et al, 2006Chambers et al, , 2012Soupios et al, 2007b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reasons this approach for 3D geoelectrical surveying is widespread in geophysical practice (Negri et al, 2008;Drahor et al, 2008;Aizebeokhai et al, 2010). In particular this 3D approach has been used into mapping the structure of different waste disposal sites (Dahlin et al, 2002;Chambers et al, 2006Chambers et al, , 2012Soupios et al, 2007b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular usage of GPR is for geologic characterization of the subsurface materials as well as for mapping of nongeologic objects. The technique is successfully found to be applicable in stratigraphic studies of sedimentary formation (Bristow and Jol, 2003), outlining the foundation of building and other engineering structures (Abbas et al, 2009), archeological investigation (Oveisy Moakhar, 2008Negri et al, 2008), mineral exploration (Gómez-Ortiz et al, 2007;El Assel et al, 2011;Francke, 2012), location of water table, and characterization of subsurface contamination (de Menezes Travassos and de Tarso Luiz Menezes, 2004;Hamzah et al, 2009;Win et al, 2011), geomorphic studies and surface subsidence (Poole et al, 2002;Gómez-Ortiz and Martín-Crespo, 2012), and as well pipe and underground objects inspection (Mohammadi Vizheh and Kamkar Rouhani, 2013).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daniels et al (1997) generically described a 3D GPR survey as an acquisition of parallel GPR lines separated by distances not much greater than half the wavelength of the transmitted EM signal. Even today, in most surveys considered as 3D, the GPR profiles are acquired along parallel lines in a single direction (e.g., Negri et al, 2008;Kadioglu, 2008;Hermozilha et al, 2010). However, a problem related to this type of survey, also called pseudo-3D survey (Novo et al, 2008), is the presence of reflectors excessively stretched orthogonally to the GPR lines due to subsampling in this direction (aliasing).…”
Section: D Gpr Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%