2012
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.2514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High relatedness in a social amoeba: the role of kin-discriminatory segregation

Abstract: A major challenge for social theory is to explain the importance of kin discrimination for the evolution of altruism. One way to assess the importance of kin discrimination is to test its effects on increasing relatedness within groups. The social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum aggregates to form a fruiting body composed of dead stalk and live spores. Previous studies of a natural population showed that where D. discoideum occurs in the soil, multiple clones are often found in the same small soil samples. How… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(128 reference statements)
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, a positive relation has been documented between the degree of genetic distance and the degree of recruitment of cells for the formation of fruiting bodies among clone-isolates from three social Mycetozoans ( D. discoideum , D. purpureum , P. violaceum ) collected in diverse localities (Mehdiabadi et al 2006; Ostrowski et al 2008; Kalla et al 2011). This raises the question if social amoebae can or need to discriminate kin from non-kin, but this possibility needs unequivocal confirmation that kin discrimination has an adaptive value for the population structure of social Dictyostelium or Polysphondylium considering that their fruiting bodies in the wild are often composed of clonal clusters (Gilbert et al 2012). Furthermore, because studies with another social amoebae, D. giganteum , have generated inconclusive results, in which cell-lineages collected from the wild and grown together cluster in fruiting bodies of variable degree of chimerism, aggregation could result from epigenetic phenomena (i.e.…”
Section: How Do Protists Discriminate Between Same Versus Different?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, a positive relation has been documented between the degree of genetic distance and the degree of recruitment of cells for the formation of fruiting bodies among clone-isolates from three social Mycetozoans ( D. discoideum , D. purpureum , P. violaceum ) collected in diverse localities (Mehdiabadi et al 2006; Ostrowski et al 2008; Kalla et al 2011). This raises the question if social amoebae can or need to discriminate kin from non-kin, but this possibility needs unequivocal confirmation that kin discrimination has an adaptive value for the population structure of social Dictyostelium or Polysphondylium considering that their fruiting bodies in the wild are often composed of clonal clusters (Gilbert et al 2012). Furthermore, because studies with another social amoebae, D. giganteum , have generated inconclusive results, in which cell-lineages collected from the wild and grown together cluster in fruiting bodies of variable degree of chimerism, aggregation could result from epigenetic phenomena (i.e.…”
Section: How Do Protists Discriminate Between Same Versus Different?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatio-temporal co-occurrence of genetic closely related individuals might be a byproduct of opportunistic colonization of patchy/ephemeral resources, where first clones arrive and proliferate while outcompeting others, or in asexual propagation of cells during vegetative cycles, such as those described in Dictyostelium and Tetrahymena (Gilbert et al 2012), or driven by immune responses by a host, like in Plasmodium (Nkhoma et al 2012). When being sampled, such clones could give us the impression of intrinsic kin-biased aggregation, kin-discrimination, or even kin-recognition, when in fact their close genetic proximity results from epigenetic phenomena, i.e.…”
Section: Ecological and Evolutionary Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interactions studied exclusively in the laboratoryas is typical of microbes-can fall short of capturing the richness that exists in the wild. In this regard, the field of slime mold biology has long held, and continues to foster, work that traverses boundaries between laboratory and field (1,7,10).…”
Section: Uncertainty and Bet Hedgingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such "cheater" types threaten persistence of altruists. How self-sacrificial behavior is thus maintained in the face of conditions that would seem to select for its elimination has motivated numerous studies (7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such organisms may exhibit discriminatory conflict but not histocompatibility. A possible example of such an organism is the cellular slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum, which exhibits some evidence of discriminatory withinorganism conflict (Buttery et al 2009;Li et al 2014) but weak histocompatibility-like behavior (Gilbert et al 2012). …”
Section: Other Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%