High rate of fistula placement in a cohort of dialysis patients in a single payer system

Abstract

Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are considered superior to arteriovenous grafts and catheters. Never-theless, AVF prevalence in the United States remains under the established target. The complication rates and financial cost of vascular access continue to rise and disproportionately contribute to the burgeoning health care costs. The relationship between financial incentives for a type of vascular access and rate of access placement is unclear. All chronic hemodialysis patients (n=99) receiving care at Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center as of August 1, 2008 were participants. Demographic characteristics, vascular access type, and nonrelative value unit compensation were assessed as predictors, and the vascular access prevalence rate, operative times, and frequency of access interventions were analyzed. A 73.7% AVF rate was achieved in this cohort of patients with 51.5% diabetes mellitus. The number of access procedures per patient per year remained constant over time. The Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, a single payer system, achieved superior AVF prevalence and exceeded the national AVF target. Financial incentives for arteriovenous graft placement currently exist in the United States, as there is similar Medicare reimbursement for arterio-venous graft and basilic vein transposition, despite longer operative times for basilic vein transpositions. The high AVF prevalence at the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center may be due to the VA nonrelative value unit-driven system that allows for interdisciplinary care, priority of AVFs, and frequent use of basilic vein transposition surgery, when appropriate. We have identified an important, hypothesis-generating example of a nonrelative value unit-based approach to vascular access yielding superior results with respect to patient care and cost.

Arteriovenous Fistula or Catheter: Creating an Optimal Vascular Access for Hemodialysis

“…Patient referral patterns, nephrological follow-up and the type of vascular access used are directly related: closely monitored patients are better prepared for dialysis. There is also an economic element, related to general population access to healthcare [5].…”