2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.07.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-rate activated sludge system for carbon management – Evaluation of crucial process mechanisms and design parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
109
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
8
109
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An SRT of 0.3 day results in a lower percentage of mineralization and higher sludge production compared to an SRT of 0.65 day. Jimenez et al (2015) reported a similar optimal SRT for maximal sludge production of 0.3 days, with a longer SRT leading to more mineralization of the COD. This indicates that the SRT control might be an important design aspect for optimization of the A-stage process; the choice should be such that most soluble COD can be converted to biomass, while minimizing endogenous or hydrolytic processes.…”
Section: Hydraulic Residence Time and Sludge Retention Timementioning
confidence: 84%
“…An SRT of 0.3 day results in a lower percentage of mineralization and higher sludge production compared to an SRT of 0.65 day. Jimenez et al (2015) reported a similar optimal SRT for maximal sludge production of 0.3 days, with a longer SRT leading to more mineralization of the COD. This indicates that the SRT control might be an important design aspect for optimization of the A-stage process; the choice should be such that most soluble COD can be converted to biomass, while minimizing endogenous or hydrolytic processes.…”
Section: Hydraulic Residence Time and Sludge Retention Timementioning
confidence: 84%
“…This is generally termed high-rate activated sludge, or A-stage treatment, and has been applied for 20 years (Jetten et al, 1997; Jimenez et al, 2015). …”
Section: Domestic Wastewater As Key Developmental Platform For Nutriementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these types of effluents, the N forms are removed traditionally by biological methods whereby the N is converted to biomass or is transformed into N 2 (g), although when biomass is anaerobically digested to produce bio‐methane, N is again re‐mineralized to NH 4 + . However, new valorization technologies for the removal and recovery of ammonium are needed to overcome problems that could be encountered in: (a) the implementation of high rate activated sludge (HRAS) or up‐concentration schemes promoting the enhancement of energy recovery by anaerobic digestion, producing treated effluents with high ammonium contents (up to 100 mg L ‐1 ); (b) new stringent regulation of N levels on the discharges of treated water (e.g. values of NH 4 + below 1 mg L ‐1 ); or (c) the need to recover nitrogen on account of its high nutrient value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%