2010 International Conference on Microelectronics 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icm.2010.5696148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High radix implementation of Montgomery multipliers with CSA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A blockwise implementation of the CIOS method of Montgomery multiplication is ideal for the purposes of this paper as it is amenable to the use of embedded multipliers in FPGAs to perform smaller multiplications. Some implementations of this algorithm are discussed in [6,37,48]. These implementations range from using a constant number of embedded multipliers to the case where the number of embedded multipliers scales linearly with the number of bits in the operands to perform large parallel multiplications.…”
Section: Return T 19: End Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A blockwise implementation of the CIOS method of Montgomery multiplication is ideal for the purposes of this paper as it is amenable to the use of embedded multipliers in FPGAs to perform smaller multiplications. Some implementations of this algorithm are discussed in [6,37,48]. These implementations range from using a constant number of embedded multipliers to the case where the number of embedded multipliers scales linearly with the number of bits in the operands to perform large parallel multiplications.…”
Section: Return T 19: End Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the FCS strategy [9], maintains the input and output operands A, B, and S in the carry-save format, denoted as (AS, AC), (BS, BC), and (SS, SC), respectively, to avoid the format conversion, leading to fewer clock cycles for completing a MM.…”
Section: International Journal For Research In Applied Science and Engimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this modular multiplication algorithm is timeconsuming algorithm [11,17]. To further improve the performance of Montgomery modular multiplication algorithm, several computational techniques and hardware implementation have been proposed such as [7,9,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27 ]. One of the efficient modular multiplication algorithms is KPartition Montgomery Modular Multiplication (KPM3) algorithm [7].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although hardware implementation of the binary Montgomery modular multiplication is simple, but it is time-consuming operation. To improve the performance of Montgomery modular multiplication algorithm and architecture, several hardware implementation method and computational techniques have been developed that can be categories into four groups: using high-radix technique [11][12][13][14][15][16][17], using systolic array architecture [18][19][20], using carry-save addition architecture [11,16,21,22,23], and using scalable architecture [9,12,24,25,26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%