2017
DOI: 10.3892/mco.2017.1180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High radiofrequency radiation at Stockholm Old Town: An exposimeter study including the Royal Castle, Supreme Court, three major squares and the Swedish Parliament

Abstract: Exposure to radiofrequency (RF) radiation was classified as a possible human carcinogen, Group 2B, by the International Agency for Research on Cancer at WHO in 2011. The exposure pattern is changing due to the rapid development of technology. Outdoor RF radiation level was measured during five tours in Stockholm Old Town in April, 2016 using the EME Spy 200 exposimeter with 20 predefined frequencies. The results were based on 10,437 samples in total. The mean level of the total RF radiation was 4,293 µW/m2 (0.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
21
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
21
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If we compare our results obtained in the Wi-Fi band with the results of the studies reviewed by Jalilian [57] and some other studies that considered measurements from Wi-Fi frequency band (Table 6), we can observe that our results are higher, except the result for Belgium which was 38.33 µW/m 2 [43]. [58] Switzerland (all environments) 1.19 Valic et al, 2015), 2015 [59] Slovenia (all environments) 4.77 Röösli et al, 2010 [6] France (all environments) 1.92 Massardier-Pilonchery et al, 2019 [60] France (all environments) 0.15 Hardell et al, 2017 [61] Sweden (School) 3.32 Roser et al, 2017 [58] Switzerland (school) 1.19 Hedendahl et al, 2017 [62] Swedish (outdoor, old town) 0.13 Gonzalez-Rubio et al, 2016 [24] Spain (outdoor) 0.53 Aminzadeh et al, 2016 [43] Belgium (office indoor, urban) 38.33 Our measurements Jordan (university area) 28.82 Furthermore, if we compare these results with those presented by Ramirez-Vazquez [20] from measurements in a Spanish town (Albacete), where the minimum value from Wi-Fi was 22.8 µW/m 2 and maximum value was 86.9 µW/m 2 , in this case, the results of our study are similar with minimum value. However, if we make a comparison with the results published by Khalid [31], who reported a maximum time-averaged intensity from a laptop of 220 µW/m 2 at a distance of 0.5 m in a laboratory in Oxfordshire, we can observe that the values of our work are smaller.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…If we compare our results obtained in the Wi-Fi band with the results of the studies reviewed by Jalilian [57] and some other studies that considered measurements from Wi-Fi frequency band (Table 6), we can observe that our results are higher, except the result for Belgium which was 38.33 µW/m 2 [43]. [58] Switzerland (all environments) 1.19 Valic et al, 2015), 2015 [59] Slovenia (all environments) 4.77 Röösli et al, 2010 [6] France (all environments) 1.92 Massardier-Pilonchery et al, 2019 [60] France (all environments) 0.15 Hardell et al, 2017 [61] Sweden (School) 3.32 Roser et al, 2017 [58] Switzerland (school) 1.19 Hedendahl et al, 2017 [62] Swedish (outdoor, old town) 0.13 Gonzalez-Rubio et al, 2016 [24] Spain (outdoor) 0.53 Aminzadeh et al, 2016 [43] Belgium (office indoor, urban) 38.33 Our measurements Jordan (university area) 28.82 Furthermore, if we compare these results with those presented by Ramirez-Vazquez [20] from measurements in a Spanish town (Albacete), where the minimum value from Wi-Fi was 22.8 µW/m 2 and maximum value was 86.9 µW/m 2 , in this case, the results of our study are similar with minimum value. However, if we make a comparison with the results published by Khalid [31], who reported a maximum time-averaged intensity from a laptop of 220 µW/m 2 at a distance of 0.5 m in a laboratory in Oxfordshire, we can observe that the values of our work are smaller.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Areas with high exposure to RF radiation were measured with an EME-Spy 200 exposimeter in Stockholm Central Railway Station where the mean total RF radiation level varied between 2,817 and 4,891 µW/m 2 (min 5.8, max 155,263.4 µW/m 2 ) for each walking round ( 73 ). In the Old Town in Stockholm, the total RF radiation varied between a mean of 404 µW/m 2 (min 20.4, max 4,088 µW/m 2 ) on the streets around the Supreme Court, 756 µW/m 2 (min 0.3, max 50,967 µW/m 2 ) around the Royal Castle, and 24,277 µW/m 2 (min 257, max 173,302 µW/m 2 ) at Järntorget, a popular square with shops and outdoor restaurants ( 74 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That place was selected since in our previous study with measurements from 2016, the Järntorget square had the highest RF radiation levels in the Old Town (see Table VI and Fig. 11 in that publication) (9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, we reported RF radiation levels in different places in Stockholm in Sweden, such as at the Central Railway station (8), the Old Town (9), in an apartment close to base stations (10) and in the City (11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%