2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevapplied.17.044046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Quality Thermal Gibbs Sampling with Quantum Annealing Hardware

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Explicitly, for the spin glass with a configuration space of size , we use 10,000 reads, which lead to around 300 (for ) to 5,000 (for ) distinct configurations in the subset S (the actual numbers fluctuate due to the non-deterministic behavior). We note that the concept of the rescaling of coupling constants has been previously used to effectively change the temperature of the distribution generated by the quantum annealer 18 , 19 , which is however not required here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Explicitly, for the spin glass with a configuration space of size , we use 10,000 reads, which lead to around 300 (for ) to 5,000 (for ) distinct configurations in the subset S (the actual numbers fluctuate due to the non-deterministic behavior). We note that the concept of the rescaling of coupling constants has been previously used to effectively change the temperature of the distribution generated by the quantum annealer 18 , 19 , which is however not required here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that irrespective of the choice of the rescaling parameter a , the low temperature magnetization always coincides with the theoretical expectation, which is obtained from a brute force sampling of the partition function. Hence, a is here not used as a method to tune the effective temperature, as compared to the approaches mentioned above 18 , 19 . As discussed above, a smaller value of a leads to sampling of more excited states, and consequently the better the agreement with the theoretical prediction also for higher temperatures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today's largest and most mature quantum annealers are produced by D-Wave Systems with a qubit technology based on superconducting loops [15][16][17][18][19]. There is still an ongoing research effort to probe the effectiveness of the D-Wave hardware as an optimization tool [20][21][22][23], as well as a Gibbs sampler [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33], which could prove useful in machine learning applications. With the latest systems from D-Wave featuring thousands of qubits, it remains important to identify the noise sources and their effects on the output statistics in order to discover further use cases for the hardware.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To model fluctuations in the programmed Hamiltonian, we use randomness in its parameters. Mixtures of random Hamiltonians with longitudinal field noise has been shown to play a major role in explaining the formation of the anomalous single qubit response to magnetic field changes [31,32] and of the effective spurious links [31,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, it has an additional output that indicates if a generated samples was created successfully or if it has to be discarded. Indeed, quantum algorithms for learning and inference of specific probabilistic models have been proposed, including quantum Bayesian networks [22], quantum Boltzmann machines [2,19,37,42], and Markov random fields [40,4,25]. However, many of these methods are either approximate or require so-called fault-tolerant quantum computers-a concept that cannot yet be realized with the state-of-the-art quantum hardware.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%