2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevstab.17.011301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-quality stable electron beams from laser wakefield acceleration in high density plasma

Abstract: High-quality, stable electron beams are produced from self-injected laser wakefield acceleration using the interaction of moderate 3 TW, 45 fs duration Ti:sapphire laser pulses with high density (>5 × 10 19 cm −3 ) helium gas jet plasma. The electron beam has virtually background-free quasimonoenergetic distribution with energy 35.6 þ3.9 −2.5 MeV, charge 3.8 þ2.8 −1.2 pC, divergence and pointing variation ∼10 mrad. The stable and high quality of the electron beam opens an easy way for applications of the laser… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, L > λ p would also lead to an overlap of injected electrons with the laser field, and, hence, a contribution of the transverse laser electric field, i.e., DLA, should also be applicable [3][4][5][6][7]. Generally, collimated high-energy QM electron beams are observed from the wakefield mechanism of acceleration [43,44], similar to the case of He in the present experiment. On the other hand, from the DLA mechanism comparatively larger divergence electron beams with broad spectra are observed [3][4][5][6][7] as seen in the case of Ar.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Generationsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, L > λ p would also lead to an overlap of injected electrons with the laser field, and, hence, a contribution of the transverse laser electric field, i.e., DLA, should also be applicable [3][4][5][6][7]. Generally, collimated high-energy QM electron beams are observed from the wakefield mechanism of acceleration [43,44], similar to the case of He in the present experiment. On the other hand, from the DLA mechanism comparatively larger divergence electron beams with broad spectra are observed [3][4][5][6][7] as seen in the case of Ar.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Generationsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…In the present experimental conditions, the laser pulse length (L ¼ cτ, where c is the velocity of light and τ is the laser pulse duration) is longer than the plasma wavelength (λ p ) and, therefore, falls in the regime where selfmodulation of the laser pulse may lead to a wakefield excitation and acceleration of electrons known as selfmodulated laser wakefield acceleration (SM-LWFA) [1,[39][40][41][42][43][44]. Furthermore, L > λ p would also lead to an overlap of injected electrons with the laser field, and, hence, a contribution of the transverse laser electric field, i.e., DLA, should also be applicable [3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gas jet was well characterized for number density of gas atoms at different backing pressures using interferometry measurements [23]. The focused laser pulse when interacts with the nitrogen gas, the nitrogen atoms will be tunnel ionized to N 5+ state by the foot of the laser pulse at intensity ~ 110 16 W/cm 2 and further ionization to N 6+ requires intensity ~ 110 19 W/cm 2 which is 5 times the peak intensity of the laser pulse at focus in vacuum. We estimate the plasma density in the interaction region accordingly from the known number density of nitrogen atoms for a given backing pressure of the gas jet.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 In this case, the initial angle of the electron beam in the dipole is unknown, which can lead to an error in determining the energy. This effect can be mitigated using a collimator 17 which allows the reduction of the incoming angle uncertainty but has the disadvantage of decreasing the charge and increasing the emittance. An imaging system (magnetic 18,19 or a plasma lens 20,21 ) can reduce this effect for a given energy range at the cost of a lower charge and a larger footprint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%