2021
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-328883/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among the South Asian adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Background: Vitamin D deficiency is linked to a wide range of chronic and infectious diseases. Body of literature suggested that the prevalence of this deficiency can have geographical variation. Although, vitamin D deficiency is frequently reported in the South Asian population, the scarcity of systematic reviews and meta-analyses means the true extent of the disease and the underlying factors causing it are poorly characterized.Methods: A systematic search was performed using databases (PubMed, Scopus and Go… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the age-wise analysis revealed that the prevalence of hypovitaminosis D is more among neonates (85%) than preschool (55%) and school-going children (57%) [Figure 5]. This may be associated with the high prevalence of vitamin D insu ciency (65%) among South Asian pregnant women which we have shown in one of our recent studies [75].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…In our study, the age-wise analysis revealed that the prevalence of hypovitaminosis D is more among neonates (85%) than preschool (55%) and school-going children (57%) [Figure 5]. This may be associated with the high prevalence of vitamin D insu ciency (65%) among South Asian pregnant women which we have shown in one of our recent studies [75].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…While all of the hypotheses proposed above could be contributing to the observed heterogeneity, slightly different cut off values (other than <20ng/mL) used by some of studies that were included in this systematic review 36,38,40,47,49,50,54 might have influenced the degree of heterogeneity in our analysis. However, such heterogeneity many not be uncommon as we have demonstrated in one of the similar studies on SA adult population 72 . However, it is clear that further study is required to reveal the true source and extent of heterogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%