2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.medmal.2019.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium infection and macrolide resistance in patients enrolled in HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
15
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The baseline resistance for macrolides was 44% in our cohort, whereas others reported resistance rates in asymptomatic screened MSM between 58% and 70% 7 10. We observed a non-significant trend of increased macrolide resistance after PrEP initiation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The baseline resistance for macrolides was 44% in our cohort, whereas others reported resistance rates in asymptomatic screened MSM between 58% and 70% 7 10. We observed a non-significant trend of increased macrolide resistance after PrEP initiation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Baseline screening showed that 6.9% of our cohort was positive for M. genitalium . Other studies which screened asymptomatic HIV-negative MSM reported a prevalence between 2.1% and 10% 7 9 10. After PrEP initiation, M. genitalium was the third most frequently observed STI, with the rates of chlamydia, gonorrhoea and syphilis being comparable with another large series of patients on PrEP 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, 60% and 30% of 20 strains showed mutations associated with macrolide and quinolone resistance, and 25% with both. Prevalence of macrolide resistance of M. genitalium may now exceed 50% [3,24] and is reported to be even higher in HIV-positive patients [25] or HIV-PrEP users [26,27], which corresponds to our results. The study from Germany calculated a rate of 80% macrolide-resistant strains [22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Different detection methods have varying levels of sensitivity, limiting scientific understanding of its epidemiology. High-income countries report rates of M. genitalium infection ranging from 0.3%-3.3% (11,13,25) in the general population, with higher estimates in certain populations (26,27). Fewer data are available from low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) but prevalence appears to be higher, ranging from 3% in the general population in Tanzania (13) to 8%-9% in Honduras and South Africa (13,28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%