2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2015.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High prevalence of abnormal motor repertoire at 3 months corrected age in extremely preterm infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
18
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
11
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finding a high prevalence (approximately 50%) of abnormal movement character in our study group (130 infants) is in line with a previous study on extremely preterm-born infants, yet in contrast to a study on 87 healthy term-borns, where the prevalence of abnormal movements was reported to be only 20% [33].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finding a high prevalence (approximately 50%) of abnormal movement character in our study group (130 infants) is in line with a previous study on extremely preterm-born infants, yet in contrast to a study on 87 healthy term-borns, where the prevalence of abnormal movements was reported to be only 20% [33].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Most infants in the intervention and control groups showed presence of fidgety movements, and in any case a significant effect of the intervention on the group of infants with absence of fidgety movements would have been hard to identify because of the small number of infants in this group. There is no evidence to suggest that the intervention had any effect on abnormal movement character, which has been previously reported to be a characteristic and prevalent finding in infants born preterm [18,33]. The high prevalence of abnormal movements in preterm-born infants was confirmed in the study, with as many as approximately half of the infants in either group showing an abnormal movement character.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Case 1 even had an age-appropriate normal repertoire of concurrent movements, though Cases 2 to 4 showed no movements towards the midline at the 14-week recording. The lack of movements towards the midline is in accordance with a recently published study on extremely preterm infants who showed fewer antigravity movements at 12 weeks postterm age than their peers born at term (Fjørtoft et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The motor repertoire of infants at 3–5 months consists not only of fidgety movements but also of other movements such as antigravity movements to the midline and legs lift, kicking, swiping, or wiggling-oscillating limb movements [13]. A detailed assessment of these age-specific movements including fidgety movements and several postural patterns was proposed in 2004 [5] and has been applied to several high-risk groups (e.g., [6,14,15,16]) but also to typically developing infants [6,17,18]. The scoring is based on the optimality concept [19], with the advantage that its semi-quantitative approach documents small changes in an otherwise categorically assessed motor behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%