2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2012.02439.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High pressure versus standard port system: Comparison of implantation and complications

Abstract: Implantation and use of a high pressure port device is safe and reliable: the complications are comparable to those of a standard port device. High pressure port systems should be considered for implantation, especially in patients who will require frequent CTs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the low rate of complications highlighted overall, and to eliminate any scope of human error with mistaking a non-power-injectable version for a TIVPP we use TIVPP as a routine, perhaps this is also worth considering. The authors make an important point in that most operators who implant these take the ‘CT-compatible’ label as a given, though previous studies do highlight their safety, 4 and thus this article brings very useful information to those involved in either implantation or usage of the same as a conduit for contrast injection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the low rate of complications highlighted overall, and to eliminate any scope of human error with mistaking a non-power-injectable version for a TIVPP we use TIVPP as a routine, perhaps this is also worth considering. The authors make an important point in that most operators who implant these take the ‘CT-compatible’ label as a given, though previous studies do highlight their safety, 4 and thus this article brings very useful information to those involved in either implantation or usage of the same as a conduit for contrast injection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%